public-rule-workshop-discuss@w3.org from August 2005 by date

Wednesday, 31 August 2005

• RE: Merging Rulesets Anthony Finkelstein
• Re: SNAF, NAF, and monotonicity [was: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules...] Christian de Sainte Marie

Tuesday, 30 August 2005

• Re: Merging Rulesets jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: SNAF, NAF, and monotonicity [was: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules...] Michael Kifer
• Re: SNAF, NAF, and monotonicity [was: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules...] Christian de Sainte Marie
• RE: Charter for WG (was Re: FOL versus Rule Languages - A tutorial) Gerd Wagner
• Re: Charter for WG (was Re: FOL versus Rule Languages - A tutorial) Michael Kifer
• Charter for WG (was Re: FOL versus Rule Languages - A tutorial) Jim Hendler
• Re: Subject: 3 - Addressing NAF Jim Hendler
• Re: Merging Rulesets Dave Reynolds

Monday, 29 August 2005

• RE: Merging Rulesets Gerd Wagner
• RE: NAF and NEG [was: LP Semantics (non-monotonicity) in Usage Scenarios?] Carlos Viegas Damásio
• RE: NAF and NEG [was: LP Semantics (non-monotonicity) in Usage Scenarios?] Carlos Viegas Damásio
• Re: NAF and NEG [was: LP Semantics (non-monotonicity) in Usage Scenarios?] Michael Kifer
• Re: NAF and NEG [was: LP Semantics (non-monotonicity) in Usage Scenarios?] Sandro Hawke
• Re: NAF and NEG [was: LP Semantics (non-monotonicity) in Usage Scenarios?] Michael Kifer
• Re: Merging Rulesets Sandro Hawke
• Re: NAF and NEG [was: LP Semantics (non-monotonicity) in Usage Scenarios?] doug foxvog
• Re: NAF and NEG [was: LP Semantics (non-monotonicity) in Usage Scenarios?] Carlos Viegas Damásio
• Re: the 80% pipe Dieter Fensel
• NAF and NEG [was: LP Semantics (non-monotonicity) in Usage Scenarios?] Gerd Wagner
• RE: Merging Rulesets Gerd Wagner

Sunday, 28 August 2005

• RE: log:notIncludes (conclusion?) Gerd Wagner
• Re: the 80% pipe Michael Kifer

Saturday, 27 August 2005

• Re: Simple and Viral Additions to the Web Martin Duerst

Sunday, 28 August 2005

• Re: log:notIncludes (conclusion?) Michael Kifer
• RE: phasing proposal Boley, Harold
• the 80% pipe Sandro Hawke

Saturday, 27 August 2005

• Re: log:notIncludes (conclusion?) Sandro Hawke
• Re: SNAF, NAF, and monotonicity [was: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules...] Michael Kifer
• Re: SNAF, NAF, and monotonicity [was: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules...] Dan Connolly
• Re: log:notIncludes (conclusion?) Michael Kifer
• Re: FOL versus Rule Languages - A tutorial Michael Kifer
• Re: log:notIncludes (conclusion?) Sandro Hawke
• Re: log:notIncludes (conclusion?) Michael Kifer
• Re: log:notIncludes (conclusion?) jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: log:notIncludes (conclusion?) Michael Kifer
• Re: log:notIncludes (conclusion?) Sandro Hawke
• Re: log:notIncludes (conclusion?) Michael Kifer
• Re: LP Semantics (non-monotonicity) in Usage Scenarios? Michael Kifer
• Re: LP Semantics (non-monotonicity) in Usage Scenarios? jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: FOL versus Rule Languages - A tutorial Michael Kifer
• Re: Draft charter: Scoping of intent? Anthony Finkelstein
• log:notIncludes (conclusion?) Sandro Hawke
• Re: FOL versus Rule Languages - A tutorial Sandro Hawke
• Re: FOL versus Rule Languages - A tutorial Michael Kifer
• Re: FOL versus Rule Languages - A tutorial Sandro Hawke
• Re: Merging Rulesets Michael Kifer
• Re: SNAF, NAF, and monotonicity [was: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules...] Michael Kifer

Friday, 26 August 2005

• Simple and Viral Additions to the Web Adrian Walker
• Re: Merging Rulesets Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: Merging Rulesets Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: SNAF, NAF, and monotonicity [was: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules...] Dan Connolly
• Re: Merging Rulesets Sandro Hawke
• Re: Merging Rulesets Michael Kifer
• Merging Rulesets Sandro Hawke
• Re: SNAF, NAF, and monotonicity [was: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules...] Michael Kifer
• Re: FOL versus Rule Languages - A tutorial Michael Kifer
• Re: FOL versus Rule Languages - A tutorial jos.deroo@agfa.com
• LP Semantics (non-monotonicity) in Usage Scenarios? Sandro Hawke
• Re: SNAF, NAF, and monotonicity [was: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules...] jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: SNAF, NAF, and monotonicity [was: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules...] Michael Kifer
• Re: Draft charter: Scoping of intent? Sandro Hawke
• Re: FOL versus Rule Languages - A tutorial Michael Kifer
• Re: SNAF, NAF, and monotonicity [was: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules...] Michael Kifer
• Re: Draft charter: Scoping of intent? Dave Reynolds
• Re: FOL versus Rule Languages - A tutorial Jim Hendler
• Re: FOL versus Rule Languages - A tutorial doug foxvog
• Re: SNAF, NAF, and monotonicity [was: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules...] doug foxvog
• RE: FOL versus Rule Languages - A tutorial Gerd Wagner
• Re: FOL versus Rule Languages - A tutorial jos.deroo@agfa.com
• FOL versus Rule Languages - A tutorial Dieter Fensel

Thursday, 25 August 2005

• RE: A Rule Interchange Format VS a Rule Language for Interoperability and other issues Gerd Wagner
• Re: SNAF, NAF, and monotonicity [was: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules...] jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: SNAF, NAF, and monotonicity [was: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules...] Michael Kifer
• Re: SNAF, NAF, and monotonicity [was: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules...] Dan Connolly
• phasing proposal Sandro Hawke
• Re: SNAF, NAF, and monotonicity [was: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules...] Michael Kifer
• Re: Draft charter: Scoping of intent? Sandro Hawke
• Re: SNAF, NAF, and monotonicity [was: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules...] Dan Connolly
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Michael Kifer
• Re: A Rule Interchange Format VS a Rule Language for Interoperability and other issues Michael Kifer
• Re: SNAF, NAF, and monotonicity [was: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules...] Michael Kifer
• Draft charter nitpicks Dave Reynolds
• Draft charter: Data expression sublanguage? Dave Reynolds
• Draft charter: Scoping of intent? Dave Reynolds
• Re: SNAF, NAF, and monotonicity [was: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules...] jos.deroo@agfa.com

Wednesday, 24 August 2005

• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Christian de Sainte Marie
• Re: A Rule Interchange Format VS a Rule Language for Interoperability and other issues Christian de Sainte Marie
• Re: A Rule Interchange Format VS a Rule Language for Interoperability and other issues Christian de Sainte Marie

Thursday, 25 August 2005

• Re: A Rule Interchange Format VS a Rule Language for Interoperability and other issues Christian de Sainte Marie
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ doug foxvog
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Michael Kifer
• Re: SNAF, NAF, and monotonicity [was: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules...] Michael Kifer
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Sandro Hawke
• Re: 2 - Relationship with OWL Jim Hendler
• SNAF, NAF, and monotonicity [was: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules...] Dan Connolly
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Michael Kifer

Wednesday, 24 August 2005

• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Michael Kifer
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Sandro Hawke
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Deductive Closure of a Relation Dieter Fensel
• Re: A Rule Interchange Format VS a Rule Language for Interoperability and other issues Dieter Fensel
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Michael Kifer
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Michael Kifer
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Michael Kifer
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Sandro Hawke
• RE: A Rule Interchange Format VS a Rule Language for Interoperability and other issues Gerd Wagner
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Michael Kifer
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Adrian Walker
• A Rule Interchange Format VS a Rule Language for Interoperability and other issues Christian de Sainte Marie
• RE: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Adrian Walker
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ jos.deroo@agfa.com
• RE: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Gerd Wagner
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Jim Hendler
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Jim Hendler
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Michael Kifer

Tuesday, 23 August 2005

• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Dieter Fensel
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Adrian Walker
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Dieter Fensel
• RE: Comment on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter 1.60 Lynn, James (Software Escalations)
• RE: Comment on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter 1.60 Adrian Walker
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Christian de Sainte Marie
• RE: Comment on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter 1.60 Lynn, James (Software Escalations)
• Subject: 3 - Addressing NAF Dieter Fensel
• 2 - Relationship with OWL Dieter Fensel
• 1 - INTENT OF THE WG Dieter Fensel
• RE: Comment on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter 1.60 Adrian Walker
• RE: Comment on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter 1.60 Lynn, James (Software Escalations)
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ jos.deroo@agfa.com
• RE: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Boley, Harold
• Re: Comment on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter 1.60 Adrian Walker
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Sandro Hawke
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Michael Kifer

Monday, 22 August 2005

• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Dieter Fensel
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Sandro Hawke
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Jim Hendler
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Dieter Fensel
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Sandro Hawke
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Sandro Hawke
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Ed Barkmeyer

Saturday, 20 August 2005

• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Adrian Walker
• Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ jos.deroo@agfa.com

Friday, 19 August 2005

• Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $ Dieter Fensel

Tuesday, 16 August 2005

• De auguem que te ama muito . . . saudade ph ph

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:13:46 UTC