- From: Jean Paul Calbimonte <jpcalbimonte@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:15:22 +0100
- To: Wetz Peter <peter.wetz@tuwien.ac.at>, "public-rsp@w3.org" <public-rsp@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 18 February 2016 09:15:56 UTC
Hi, I think others can answer this question better, but I think we discussed this at some point, here: https://www.w3.org/community/rsp/wiki/Aggregate_Clause CSPARQL used to support a different type of aggregate than the one supported by SPARQL1.1. Jean-Paul From: peter.wetz@tuwien.ac.at To: public-rsp@w3.org Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:20:30 +0000 Subject: (non-)shrinking semantics of aggregates
Received on Thursday, 18 February 2016 09:15:56 UTC