- From: Tara Athan <taraathan@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 10:33:07 -0500
- To: public-rsp@w3.org
In the telecon today, there was not enough participation for a quorum, but we had an interesting discussion nonetheless. I learned that there may be some implicit requirements that are not spelled out in the various documents, at least in a readily accessible form. For those of us joining the group that have not had the benefit of the historical discussions, it would be quite helpful to have an explicit statement of scope and requirements. Here are some questions I have: 1. What information from the stream transmission (as a sequence) - which might include contents of the timestamp triple, timestamped graph, and order of transmission sequence - should be allowed to influence the substream selection by a window function? - As a particular example of such "extra" information, in the case of temporal entities with a partial order, would the order of transmission, which is not deterministically specified by the timestamps, be usable in the application of a count-based window function? 2. What information from the substream sequence thus selected may influence the query result? - As a particular example of such "extra" information, is the semantics of the timestamped graph such that it is assumed the graph name denotes the explicitly-transmitted graph? If so, I don't think this is compatible with http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-rdf11-datasets-20140225/#each-named-graph-defines-its-own-context, as currently stated in the Semantics document, but is instead a case of http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-rdf11-datasets-20140225/#the-graph-name-denotes-the-named-graph-or-the-graph Finally, I think it would be quite helpful if we had more concrete examples of RDF streams in the repository, using e.g. the JSON-LD serialization as defined in https://github.com/streamreasoning/RSP-QL/blob/master/Serialization.md . I have committed such an example at https://github.com/streamreasoning/RSP-QL/tree/master/Example_RDF_Streams, for which I would like to ask the group whether the handling of the missing data in this example is within scope? Tara
Received on Friday, 18 December 2015 15:33:36 UTC