- From: Jean Paul Calbimonte <jpcalbimonte@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 01:29:20 +0100
- To: "public-rsp@w3.org" <public-rsp@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <DUB127-W44BA1877B2497A1F954757A7830@phx.gbl>
Hello All, We had an interesting discussion last friday. From the use cases and queries we saw, I identified some features that seem to be needed/useful: - subqueries - time windows - query from multiple streams - join with static data - aggreagates - timestamps on graphs - sequence? (we didn't discuss it but look at the OpenGov use case) If your use case has other stuff don't hesitate to add some sample queries in the wiki, or through this list, so that we can discuss that. Other than that we have seen that using system time for annotating data items can be misleading. If we specify a window, we probably want to refer to an application time. However this brings problems as well (e.g. order guarantees). Finally, Daniele and I started working on the semantics of time windows on timestamped graphs. If you want to take a look, edit or rewrite it: https://www.w3.org/community/rsp/wiki/RSP_Query_Semantics We are also considering the case when the annotation is an interval, but it's not too clear what the window should do in that case. Any thoughts welcome. By the way the minutes are online https://www.w3.org/community/rsp/wiki/Telecon_21.02.2014 best, Jean-Paul
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2014 00:29:51 UTC