- From: Jean-Paul <jpcalbimonte@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:20:04 +0100
- To: "public-rsp@w3.org" <public-rsp@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+vpjuXDj3mHXqEUqnjq_Ev2tSeQidsG3OWyRnkGLv40pw165w@mail.gmail.com>
Hello All, As we committed to start working on this model, I gave it a first try, taking into account the discussion we had on the calls and on the mailing list. It's just a first attempt, so please feel free to criticize and/or entirely rewrite it and/or discuss it in the list as well. As it is on the wiki, everyone can provide her input or modify it ;) http://www.w3.org/community/rsp/wiki/RDF_Stream_Model See you next week, I would also like to ask DERI for hosting the call, as they have gently done so until now. Good weekend! Jean-Paul 2013/12/12 Axel Polleres <axel@polleres.net> > Darko, > > you are bringing validity time into the picture, it seems… whereas I > understood that the use for time stamps at the moment was mainly meant for > transaction time… [1] > is that right? If we have use cases that need validity time, I also think > intervals make sense (FWIW, we have designed an extension for SPARQL to > query validity time intervals [2]). > > best, > Axel > > 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temporal_database > 2. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570826811000771 > > -- > Prof. Dr. Axel Polleres > Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna > url: http://www.polleres.net/ twitter: @AxelPolleres > > On Dec 12, 2013, at 5:05 PM, "Anicic, Darko" <darko.anicic@siemens.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Jean-Paul, Emanuele and all, > > > > I like the proposal too, but I would not limit the proposal only to one > time stamp. As we discussed before, I find the interval-based definition > better, e.g., with startTime and endTime. The startTime may be optional in > cases where the point-based timestamp is preferred, e.g., similarly as in > [1] - a related approach to the Streaming Linked Data Framework, sent by > Emanuele (see #6 in Section Vocabulary from [1]). > > > > Cheers, > > Darko > > > > [1] http://km.aifb.kit.edu/sites/lodstream/ > > > > Von: Emanuele Della Valle [mailto:emanuele.dellavalle@polimi.it] > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Dezember 2013 11:15 > > An: Jean-Paul; Anicic, Darko; public-rsp@w3.org > > Betreff: Re: [RSP] Call Minutes > > > > Hi Jean-Paul, Darko and all, > > > > I like the proposal. You may want to check out [1] where a similar > approach was proposed. We named the graphs o *instantaneous graphs* > (shortly iGraphs) and the graph containing the meta data Stream Graph > (shortly sGraph). This solution is currently implemented in our Streaming > Linked Data Framework [2]. > > > > GRAPH :sGraphA { > > :iGraph-1 :timeStamp "t_1"^^xsd:dateTimestamp . > > :iGraph-2 :timeStamp "t_2"^^xsd:dateTimestamp . > > … > > :iGraph-n :timeStamp "t_n"^^xsd:dateTimestamp . > > } > > > > GRAPH :iGraph-1 {…} > > GRAPH :iGraph-2 {…} > > > > GRAPH :iGraph-n {…} > > > > Cheers, > > > > Emanuele > > > > [1] http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-628/ldow2010_paper11.pdf > > [2] http://disi.unitn.it/~themis/publications/iswc13.pdf > > > > > > > > On Dec 9, 2013, at 5:07 PM, Jean-Paul < > jpcalbimonte@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > The one in [1] is a very generic model proposed by Axel. We agreed to > start from it to define the RDF Stream model. > > If you see the minutes, you will see we are pointing to something that > *might* look like this: > > > > o :timeStamp "foo"^^xsd:dateTimestamp . GRAPH o { t1, tn} > > > > We have set an ACTION, that consists in formalizing these ideas in the > wiki. It is our homework for next call. But we can surely discuss here as > well. > > > > best regards, > > jp > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/12/9 Anicic, Darko <darko.anicic@siemens.com> > > Hi all, > > > > since I was not present at the last telco, could you please let me know > whether the RDF stream model that was discussed actually is the one > described as “graph oriented” in [1], or there are some differences in the > two? > > Cheers, > > Darko > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/community/rsp/wiki/RDF_Stream_Models > > > > Von: jean.paul.ik@gmail.com [mailto:jean.paul.ik@gmail.com] Im Auftrag > vonJean-Paul > > Gesendet: Samstag, 7. Dezember 2013 00:19 > > An: public-rsp@w3.org > > Betreff: [RSP] Call Minutes > > > > Hi all, > > > > Please find in the wiki the minutes of today's call. Next one is on Dec > 20th, and is the last for 2013. We will restart in January, the 17th. > > > > http://www.w3.org/community/rsp/wiki/Telecon_06.12.2013 > > > > Thanks again for your support. > > > > Good weekend! > > Jean-Paul > > > > -- > > jpcik! > > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > I have moved to EPFL, please email me to: > > jean-paul.calbimonte@epfl.ch > > > > > > > > -- > > jpcik! > > > -- jpcik!
Received on Friday, 13 December 2013 15:20:37 UTC