- From: Joshue O'Connor - InterAccess <josh@interaccess.ie>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 15:02:50 +0000
- To: "Jason J.G. White" <jason@jasonjgw.com>, RQTF <public-rqtf@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <em2f22e26e-9567-4d41-8095-8d966ccd0d10@050c4801.com>
Noted! Thanks for that Jason. -- Joshue O’Connor Director | InterAccess.ie ------ Original Message ------ From "Jason J.G. White" <jason@jasonjgw.com> To "RQTF" <public-rqtf@w3.org> Date 20/01/2025, 14:25:50 Subject Citations and references in W3C (including RQTF) publications >Dear colleagues, > > > >My purpose is to make public and to carry forward a conversation >started with Janina and Scott recently. We decided it would be >worthwhile to inquire whether there is an approach that could be taken >to cite references in W3C publications using one of the commonly >available bibliographical data formats. Currently, bibliography entries >are in a custom SpecRef format designed to cite technical >specifications, but not to cite journal literature or other scholarly >sources. > > > >Based on preliminary observations, BibTeX and RIS bibliography data >formats seem to be widely used. Google Scholar, for example, can export >references in any of BibTeX, EndNote, RefMan (I think that’s RIS) or >RefWorks formats. > > > >The goal would be to be able to cite references provided in one of >these formats directly in W3C publications, with automatic generation >of a suitable citation style and a bibliography entry. > > > >Thank you, Janina, for taking up the issue. I appreciate resolution may >take time, but it will facilitate work on our Artificial Intelligence >and Machine Learning document when we reach the point of reworking the >citations and bibliography. I, at least, don’t want to be writing >bibliography entries by hand in JSON format. > > > >Regards, > > > >Jason. > > >
Received on Monday, 20 January 2025 15:03:02 UTC