- From: Scott Hollier <scott.hollier@accessibility.org.au>
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 02:37:50 +0000
- To: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, "public-rqtf@w3.org" <public-rqtf@w3.org>
TO Janina Agree with the wording and also agree that clause is not really necessary given how the timing of our work is picked up. Scott. Dr Scott Hollier Chief Executive Officer Centre For Accessibility Australia Ltd. Phone: +61 (0)430 351 909 Email: scott.hollier@accessibility.org.au Address: Suite 5, Belmont Hub, 213 Wright Street, Cloverdale WA 6105 accessibility.org.au Subscribe to our newsletter CFA Australia respectfully acknowledges the Traditional Owners of Country across Australia and pay our respects to Elders past and present. -----Original Message----- From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> Sent: Friday, 28 February 2025 2:24 AM To: public-rqtf@w3.org Subject: Edited TF Description Colleagues: The management edited description for RQTF is now proposed as follows: The Research Questions (RQ) Task Force) identifies accessibility barriers and knowledge gaps in emerging and future web technologies; publishes the research findings on those barriers and gaps; and supports W3C's horizontal reviews of web technologies as they mature and are normatively specified. Please advise any concerns. I'm inclined to suggest we could likely drop the final clause, the one that begins "as they mature ..." Best, Janina -- Janina Sajka (she/her/hers) Accessibility Consultant https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Co-Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa Linux Foundation Fellow https://www.linuxfoundation.org/board-of-directors-2/
Received on Friday, 28 February 2025 02:37:57 UTC