Re: CTAUR: proposed additional requirement for distraction avoidance in collaborative editing

Thank you, Janina, for your review.

I would like to clarify that #60 only changes section 1.3, but it 
modifies existing text as well as introducing additions.

On 19/1/24 02:19, Janina Sajka wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> I have just reviewed 4 PR in the CTAUR repository. Yes, I was surprised
> to find 4 as I was expecting only 3.
>
> I defer to Jason on the order of the merges, but I see no reason not to
> merge 61, 62, and 653.
>
> I'm a bit confused about 60. Unlike the others mentioned, this one
> appears to edit throughout the CTAUR document. Still, I have no
> objection as we should apply all our existing edits, imo, before I take
> a deep pass to introduce more mention of other collaborative
> environments. I also intend to try and better clarify that we're
> addressing AUR for collaboration only, and not for the type of content
> on which a group is collaborating as this appears to continue to confuse
> some of our readers.
>
> Best,
> Janina
>
>
> Scott Hollier writes:
>> TO Jason
>>
>> I agree ??? happy for that one ot be merged too.
>>
>> Scot.
>>
>>
>> Dr Scott Hollier
>> CEO & Co-founder
>> [Centre for Accessibility Australia logo]<https://www.accessibility.org.au/>
>> Centre For Accessibility Australia Ltd.
>> Phone: +61 (0)430 351 909
>> Email: scott.hollier@accessibility.org.au<mailto:scott.hollier@accessibility.org.au>
>> Address: Suite 5, Belmont Hub, 213 Wright Street, Cloverdale WA 6105
>>
>> accessibility.org.au<https://www.accessibility.org.au/>
>> Subscribe to our newsletter<http://eepurl.com/drA-ib>
>> [Instagram icon]<https://www.instagram.com/centreforaccessibility/> [Facebook icon] <https://www.facebook.com/centreforaccessibility>  [Twitter icon] <https://twitter.com/centrefora11y>  [LinkedIn icon] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/centreforaccessibility/>
>>
>> CFA Australia respectfully acknowledges the Traditional Owners of Country across Australia and pay our respects to Elders past, present and emerging
>>
>>
>> From: Jason J.G. White <jason@jasonjgw.net>
>> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2024 10:16 PM
>> To: Scott Hollier <scott.hollier@accessibility.org.au>; RQTF <public-rqtf@w3.org>
>> Subject: Re: CTAUR: proposed additional requirement for distraction avoidance in collaborative editing
>>
>>
>>
>> On 18/1/24 00:18, Scott Hollier wrote:
>>
>> I've also reviewed the other issues, all good to be merged in my view.
>>
>> Thank you, Scott. Let's note any other reviews that come in by tomorrow at 1400 UTC, and make a merging decision.
>>
>> I know the additional pull request I created yesterday is not subject to our review deadline. However, I think it would be reasonable for us to merge it, unless someone wants more time and opportunity to review first.
>>
>> If you want more time to review, please notify us before tomorrow at 1400 UTC.
>>
>> Also, we can of course continue to make changes after we've merged the pull requests, so this decision is not particularly significant anyway.
>
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 19 January 2024 10:30:22 UTC