Re: format for COGA comments on CTAUR

Dear Lisa:

Thank you for this email and your pointer to the ongoing work providing
comments to CTAUR.

RQTF took most of today's call to discuss both how effective the
approach is, but also to discuss the developing comments. I would ask
you to review today's RQTF minutes in the expectation they will be
helpful on both counts. Those are at this link:

https://www.w3.org/2023/07/26-rqtf-minutes.html

Best,
Janina

Lisa Seeman writes:
> Hello  APA and RTQF
> 
> COGA will soon finished our review of Collaboration Tools Accessibility
> User Requirements (we still have a last round for comments and editorial
> changes)
> 
>  See 2023 COGA Review of CTAUR - Collaboration Tools Accessibility User
> Requirements
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CJhBYRI-zk2rl_mohHZ63xAGZxzpDMxhHhXT66bjFBI/edit>
> 
> 
> We have highlighted and tagged all our suggestions and marked the with  the
> word "COGA" . We are also numbering them by type (user need, REQ etc)
> 
> 
> Is this  a format you can use?
> 
> 
> All the best
> 
> Lisa Seeman-Horwitz
> 
> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>

-- 

Janina Sajka (she/her/hers)
Accessibility Consultant https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka

The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
Co-Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures	http://www.w3.org/wai/apa

Linux Foundation Fellow
https://www.linuxfoundation.org/board-of-directors-2/

Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2023 13:49:36 UTC