Re: Maturity Model Worksheet Reference statement

Jeff:

You have again not included the email list for our group. Please always
include the list on this kind of conversation. we need the data in the
archives.

I'm taking the liberty of adding the list now, just because it should
have been there to begin with.

Janina

Jeff Kline writes:
> Oh. I just realized you are working from the old spreadsheet!!! Now I understand your questions!! Here is a link to the correct one<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1E0b72b8HvRf-kDRxCAsqkkb4ZBvw1UsiithcVQWsu0Y/edit#gid=1901736194>.
> 
> Sorry for the confusion!
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> [A picture containing text, black, clock  Description automatically generated]
>     jeffrey.l.kline@gmail.com
>     5  1  2  .  4  2  6  .  9   7  7  9
> 
> From: Mary Jo Mueller <maryjom@us.ibm.com>
> Date: Friday, July 22, 2022 at 5:24 PM
> To: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, Jeff Kline <jeffrey.l.kline@gmail.com>
> Cc: Sheri Byrne Haber <sbyrnehaber@vmware.com>, David Fazio <dfazio@helixopp.com>, jake abma <jake.abma@gmail.com>, Nadine Sienel <sienel@hdm-stuttgart.de>
> Subject: RE: Maturity Model Worksheet Reference statement
> I’m having difficulty with knowing exactly where to incorporate the changes Jeff proposed. What I did is put the changes (with a few edits) in section 2.4 Assessment Template, as it’s really the first place we talk about having or linking to a template. Feel free to change as you see fit since I’ll be away this week. If no one gets to the changes before I return, just let me know what changes you want and I can incorporate them on my return.
> 
> I’ve also added a link to the specific sheet for each dimension at the top of the Ratings for Evaluation section. Please review that content and feel free to edit as well.
> 
> Note: The linked spreadsheet template<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fzPlHjHIaSQn9GvpJd86SDpV49U8Beg_iXj6K5aeyGg/edit#gid=1978892812> seems to have some spelling errors and the tabs each have the word “Evidence” as well as some tabs marked “(Delete???)” and a tab marked as an example. Is that the right version of the spreadsheet? If so, it seems it’s not completely updated. Or did I have the wrong link?
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Mary Jo
> _______________________________________
> Mary Jo Mueller
> IBM Accessibility Standards Program Manager
> 
> "If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader."  ~John Quincy Adams
> --
> 
> 
> From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
> Date: Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 3:13 AM
> To: Jeff Kline <jeffrey.l.kline@gmail.com>
> Cc: Sheri Byrne Haber <sbyrnehaber@vmware.com>, David Fazio <dfazio@helixopp.com>, Mary Jo Mueller <maryjom@us.ibm.com>, jake abma <jake.abma@gmail.com>, Nadine Sienel <sienel@hdm-stuttgart.de>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Maturity Model Worksheet Reference statement
> I know RQTF, and also the wider APA will want clarity here--now that the
> question has been clarified.
> 
> There's nothing wrong with putting out two approaches and requesting
> comment, but only if the group can reasonably justify the value of one
> approach on the one hand and the other approach on the other hand. This
> should be a group decision, the Maturity Model Subgroup's decision.
> 
> 
> So, I need to ask, is there clarity that we need to publish both? Or
> isJeff correct, that we have essentially coalesced on a single approach,
> but perhaps have a minority opinion?
> 
> This could be a snag that could set our timeline back. Since we're not
> meeting next week, let's please try and resolve via email. If that's a
> bit more than we can achieve, let's get very clear about the whys and
> wherefores of having both or only the one and clearly RESOLUTION: a
> decision on the 3rd.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Janina
> 
> Jeff Kline writes:
> > Sheri,
> >
> > The one you were referring to is outdated and no longer maps to our latest version of the model document. Therefore, I think we should just go with the current one.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> > > On Jul 20, 2022, at 3:18 PM, Sheri Byrne Haber <sbyrnehaber@vmware.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > Do you want to add a line in there about how there are two of them, and they represent two different approaches to doing the model assessment (or something like that?)
> > >
> > > I’m good without it, it’s not a deal breaker, but I think it might reduce confusion
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Sheri
> > >
> > > -----
> > > Sheri Byrne-Haber
> > > Senior Staff, Accessibility Architect
> > > Mobile: 650 703 2376 (please text first if you have not called me before, otherwise it may go to VM)
> > >
> > > Upcoming OOO: Will be traveling July 14,15.  Expect a delay in my replies
> > >
> > > Phonetic pronunciation:   shei riə bUHRn heɪ buhr
> > > Audio:   https://vimeo.com/665808784
> > > ASL Name Sign:  https://vimeo.com/665809840
> > >
> > > From: Jeff Kline <jeffrey.l.kline@gmail.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2022 12:31 PM
> > > To: Sheri Byrne Haber <sbyrnehaber@vmware.com>
> > > Cc: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>; David Fazio <dfazio@helixopp.com>; Mary Jo Mueller <maryjom@us.ibm.com>; jake abma <jake.abma@gmail.com>; Nadine Sienel <sienel@hdm-stuttgart.de>
> > > Subject: Maturity Model Worksheet Reference statement
> > >
> > > ⚠ External Email
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Note about the Maturity Model Worksheet Template Prototype:
> > >
> > > Please note that the Maturity Model worksheet used for measuring organizational maturity and  referenced / linked in this document was developed in a google sheets format and is intended as a high-fidelity prototype. The final published format is still TBD, but envisioned as HTML and possible other downloadable, accessible formats.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >     jeffrey.l.kline@gmail.com
> > >     5  1  2  .  4  2  6  .  9   7  7  9
> > >
> > > ⚠ External Email: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.
> 
> --
> 
> Janina Sajka (she/her/hers)
> https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka
> 
> The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
> Co-Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures     http://www.w3.org/wai/apa



-- 

Janina Sajka (she/her/hers)
https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka

The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
Co-Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa

Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2022 17:22:51 UTC