- From: Joshue O'Connor <joconnor@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 14:41:37 +0000
- To: John Paton <John.Paton@rnib.org.uk>
- Cc: "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org>, "public-rqtf@w3.org" <public-rqtf@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 4 March 2021 14:41:42 UTC
John Paton wrote on 04/03/2021 09:22: > > HCO – Hearing Carry Over > > For someone who can hear well enough but is speech impaired. > > The user types text but receives spoken audio. > > VCO – Voice Carry Over > > For someone who can’t hear well enough to follow a conversation but > prefers speaking to typing. > > User speaks but receives replies in text. > > Captioned Telephony > > Multimodal communication where the user receives a live captions of > the speech. Technical issues mean mistakes in the captions are common > and there is always a lag. > > User speaks but receives both speech and text in return. > This is excellent John, thank you! Josh > For symmetry I can imagine a captioned telephony where the user types > but receives speech and text in return. I haven’t seen it in the wild. > > If a system only supported text -> text OR voice -> voice then HCO and > VCO would need the user to switch but I’m not aware of a use case > where the user preferences would change part the way through a call. > > In a human-machine interaction though if a user preferred to use their > voice but the speech recognition didn’t understand them they may > switch to text for that part or the rest of the call. They may also > want the ability to edit (in text) the phrase that the computer > understood from their speech. So there are use cases for multimodal > input too. > -- Emerging Web Technology Specialist/Accessibility (WAI/W3C)
Received on Thursday, 4 March 2021 14:41:42 UTC