- From: Joshue O'Connor <joconnor@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 13:17:16 +0000
- To: Scott Hollier <scott@hollier.info>
- Cc: "public-rqtf@w3.org" <public-rqtf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <7f840b1a-0cdd-f883-5e39-46a42e71b600@w3.org>
Hi Scott, Thanks for the comments below. I have added your suggested edits to the editors draft. http://raw.githack.com/w3c/apa/2021-jan-raur/raur/index.html I think your input makes both sections really much better. I must also thank you for the prompt to actually define the term 'user needs' - and it was on my burner to do it, but I hadn't - so appreciated. Thanks Josh > Scott Hollier <mailto:scott@hollier.info> > Tuesday 9 February 2021 09:41 > > To the RQTF > > I’ve finished reviewing the RQTF which is looking fantastic. > > In terms of the technical aspects, it all looks great to me – no > changes or comments. I appreciate we’ve workshoped this for quite some > time so it all looks great ot me. > > In terms the use cases read great. Perhaps it’s because I’ve been > doing a bit of work on Easy English recently, rereading the > introducitons through those eyes I think there’s a few things we could > do to make the document have a better entry point for people wanting > to know what the RAUR is and what it represents. > > SO here’s a few suggested things that could be reworked a little. > > Abstract: great, no issue. > > Introduction: > > * I’d like to see the ‘what is RTC? Reworked. Here’s how it stands: > > What is Real-time communication (RTC)? > > The traditional data exchange model is client to server. Real-time > communication (RTC) is game-changing as it is enabled in part by > specifications like WebRTC that provides real-time peer to peer audio, > video and data exchange directly between supported user agents. This > enables instantaneous applications for video and audio calls, text > chat, file exchange, screen sharing and gaming, all without the need > for browser plugins. However, WebRTC is not the sole specification > with responsibility to enable accessible real-time communications, as > use cases and requirements are broad - as outlined in the IETF RFC > 7478 'Web Real-Time Communication Use Cases and Requirements' > document. [ietf-rtc] > > ---- > > * If the reader wants to know what RTC is, it currently requires a > bit of digging through the text. I’d like to see the first > sentence as ‘RTC is…’ then a clear a definition in response to > the heading ‘What is RTC?’ and then go onto explain the relevance > of WebRTC, game-changer, etc. > * RTC accessibility: great. This is a good example of how the > definition is more clear > * User needs definition: similar to first comment. Currently reads as: > > ---. > > 2 User needs definition > > This document outlines various accessibility related user needs for > Accessible RTC. These user needs should drive accessibility > requirements for Accessible RTC and its related architecture. > > User needs are presented here with their related requirements; some in > a range of scenarios (which can be thought of as similar to user > stories). User needs and requirements are being actively reviewing by > RQTF/APA. > > * Again given the section is called ‘user needs’ definition’, it’d > be good to start with ‘A user need is…’ and explain it, then go > onto the rest of the text. At the moment it talks about user needs > but in my opinion doesn’t define it. > > That’s rpetty much all I could find at the moment. : not much but > hopefully helpful. Fantastic work everyone. > > Scott. > > Scott Hollier logo*Dr Scott Hollier * > > Digital Access Specialist > > Mobile: +61 (0)430 351 909 > > Web: www.hollier.info <http://www.hollier.info/> > > Technology for everyone > > Keep up with digital access news by following @scotthollier on Twitter > <https://twitter.com/scotthollier>. > -- Emerging Web Technology Specialist/Accessibility (WAI/W3C)
Received on Thursday, 11 February 2021 13:17:24 UTC