RE: SAUR Time line for edits on the FPWD.

For the BBC whitepaper, if no further clarifications arise, we could proceed as follows for the first public working draft:
1. Move the summary of the findings of the whitepaper from the editors' note into the body of the document (i.e., no longer in n editors' note).
2. Add an editors' note stating that the Task Force is still reviewing this research.

Alternative proposals are of course welcome.



-----Original Message-----
From: Joshue O'Connor <>
Sent: Friday, 27 August 2021 7:26
To: White, Jason J <>
Cc: RQTF <>
Subject: Re: SAUR Time line for edits on the FPWD.

White, Jason J wrote on 26/08/2021 16:53:
> Thank you, Josh. It now appears likely to be next week. At next week's meeting, we could of course decide in the interests of the publishing schedule to add editors' notes for any issues that aren't adequately resolved by then.

Sounds good Jason - just trying to help keep things on track.

Thanks a mil

Emerging Web Technology Specialist/Accessibility (WAI/W3C)


This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.

Thank you for your compliance.


Received on Friday, 27 August 2021 14:44:36 UTC