Understanding where the remote meetings work fits

To the RQTF

Thanks to Janina providing this link:


https://www.w3.org/2020/Process-20200915/#Reports


and a few others, I’m of the view that the remote meetings draft seems to fit the requirements for being progressed into a Note base don the definitions.  I had a concern previously that as it provides guidance to multiple audiences it may be an  issue but I can’t see this defined as an issue specifically.

What do others think?  I’m still not entirely clear on the difference between a Note, a resource and statement in terms of defining the work so it’d be helpful to discuss on list before our next meeting.

Thanks everyone,

Scott.



[Scott Hollier logo]Dr Scott Hollier
Digital Access Specialist
Mobile: +61 (0)430 351 909
Web: www.hollier.info<http://www.hollier.info/>

Technology for everyone

Keep up with digital access news by following @scotthollier on Twitter<https://twitter.com/scotthollier>.

From: Scott Hollier
Sent: Thursday, 26 August 2021 10:16 AM
To: White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org>; public-rqtf@w3.org
Subject: RE: Editorial revisions to Accessibility of Remote Meetings

To the RQTF

Thanks for that Jason. I had a read through prior to yesterday’s meeting and it’s looking really good at this stage, great work.

Also from the meeting, I’d like to follow up on Janina’s comment that we need to identify what we’re doing with this, and by memory we agreed two weeks ago that there was plans to discuss on the WAI call

That said, I’m thinking that as a group we can help progress what we think is best for the document, and for me it’d really help if I could read some definitions as to how W3C defines particular documents. Is there a link where it specifically explains the differences between Note, resource and statement?  I thinkthis’d be helpful in the review to see what definitions line up best with the content at the moment and make some decisions Abou it going forward.

Thanks everyone,

Scott.



[Scott Hollier logo]Dr Scott Hollier
Digital Access Specialist
Mobile: +61 (0)430 351 909
Web: www.hollier.info<http://www.hollier.info/>

Technology for everyone

Keep up with digital access news by following @scotthollier on Twitter<https://twitter.com/scotthollier>.

From: White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org<mailto:jjwhite@ets.org>>
Sent: Thursday, 26 August 2021 4:07 AM
To: public-rqtf@w3.org<mailto:public-rqtf@w3.org>
Subject: RE: Editorial revisions to Accessibility of Remote Meetings

Dear colleagues,
Time constraints did not permit us to discuss these proposed changes to Accessibility of Remote Meetings today. Thus, any review that you can offer prior to next week’s meeting would be welcome in order to facilitate progress.
I also anticipate further discussion of our publication plans for this document (raised briefly at today’s meeting, but likely to be considered more fully next week).
The original note regarding the changes is reproduced for convenience below.

From: White, Jason J
Sent: Friday, 20 August 2021 11:36
To: public-rqtf@w3.org<mailto:public-rqtf@w3.org>
Subject: Editorial revisions to Accessibility of Remote Meetings

Dear colleagues,

I have reorganized aspects of the Accessibility of Remote Meetings draft, while introducing clarificatory, editorial changes.

The pull request on GitHub is at
https://github.com/w3c/apa/pull/227


The proposed text is rendered at
https://raw.githack.com/w3c/apa/remote-meetings-clarification/remote-meetings/



________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.

________________________________