RE: RAUR: New use case for total conversation clarification

Thank you, Josh. In case this was a point of confusion, I should clarify that simultaneous support for all of these streams (in a single RTC session) is, as I understand it, exactly what support for a Total Conversation service amounts to. Thus, if you are proposing that this is all we need, then I agree completely.

Simply documenting a need for voice/video/RTT in the same session would cover it, if my understanding is correct.

-----Original Message-----
From: Joshue O Connor <joconnor@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 9:44 AM
To: White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org>
Cc: RQTF <public-rqtf@w3.org>; group-apa-chairs@w3.org
Subject: Re: RAUR: New use case for total conversation clarification

On 12/10/2020 13:49, White, Jason J wrote:

> Thank you, Josh. Do you recall what the issues were?

I don't tbh, I think some of Janina's concerns were around a lack of specifics with this one. We may take the view that by encouraging support for use of these various simultaneous streams such as, video, audio, RTT etc without session refreshes may be all we need to do.

This is one for a future agenda in RQTF, so lets discuss when we next have a chance.

Thanks

Josh

--
Emerging Web Technology Specialist/Accessibility (WAI/W3C)


________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.

________________________________

Received on Monday, 12 October 2020 14:05:51 UTC