Re: RAUR and XAUR relationship: New note or user need and requirements?

Very insightful comments Jason. I agree and tend to come down on the 
site of noting the relationship in this version, but I'm happy to hear 
from others, as well as over the coming weeks have a more detailed 
discussion to happen about RTC requirements in XR.

Thanks

Josh

> White, Jason J <mailto:jjwhite@ets.org>
> Thursday 8 October 2020 13:56
> It seems to me that noting the relationship should be sufficient for 
> the moment. However, it would be valuable to consider whether there 
> are user needs related to real-time communication applications that 
> only apply in XR contexts.
>
> One characterization of the relationship would be to note that if the 
> RTC application is also an XR application, then relevant XAUR 
> requirements should be addressed as well. This, for instance, would 
> accommodate immersive caption requirements - assuming that these are 
> ultimately covered by XAUR; and similarly for other XR-specific 
> accessibility issues.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joshue O Connor <joconnor@w3.org>
> Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2020 8:30 AM
> To: RQTF <public-rqtf@w3.org>
> Subject: RAUR and XAUR relationship: New note or user need and 
> requirements?
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm working on updating the RAUR and a question comes to mind about 
> how to present the nexus between XAUR/RAUR. I've a sense this needs 
> some further discussion/thought.
>
> There are a couple of options from:
>
> 1) Add a note about XAUR to the 'Quality of Service' section - there 
> are references there to audio quality etc and I could add something 
> brief about RTC type applications and remote meeting in XR.
> 2) Create a new user need - XR and RTC - I'm happy to draft one along 
> the lines of.
>
> 'DRAFT User Need: A user with disability x needs to attend remote 
> meetings in XR' but then there is a potential for a range of new 
> requirements etc. So just I'm not sure how far to go with this if we 
> take this option.
>
> Is the first option around just adding a note, with a paragraph 
> sufficient here do we think? I'm inclined to think so for now but 
> would like input. Or do we want to discuss the new user need option?
>
> Thoughts welcome!
>
> Josh
> --
> Emerging Web Technology Specialist/Accessibility (WAI/W3C)
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged 
> or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual 
> for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you 
> received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not 
> disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the 
> contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any 
> other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>
>
> Thank you for your compliance.
>
> ________________________________
> Joshue O Connor <mailto:joconnor@w3.org>
> Thursday 8 October 2020 13:29
> Hi all,
>
> I'm working on updating the RAUR and a question comes to mind about 
> how to present the nexus between XAUR/RAUR. I've a sense this needs 
> some further discussion/thought.
>
> There are a couple of options from:
>
> 1) Add a note about XAUR to the 'Quality of Service' section - there 
> are references there to audio quality etc and I could add something 
> brief about RTC type applications and remote meeting in XR.
> 2) Create a new user need - XR and RTC - I'm happy to draft one along 
> the lines of.
>
> 'DRAFT User Need: A user with disability x needs to attend remote 
> meetings in XR' but then there is a potential for a range of new 
> requirements etc.  So just I'm not sure how far to go with this if we 
> take this option.
>
> Is the first option around just adding a note, with a paragraph 
> sufficient here do we think? I'm inclined to think so for now but 
> would like input. Or do we want to discuss the new user need option?
>
> Thoughts welcome!
>
> Josh


-- 
Emerging Web Technology Specialist/Accessibility (WAI/W3C)