- From: Joshue O Connor <joconnor@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 11:55:48 +0000
- To: RQTF <public-rqtf@w3.org>
Hi all, Our discussion in RQTF yesterday about security, privacy and accessibility has produced some further thoughts. Janina makes the point that many of the user needs and requirements for security and privacy are generic, and broadly applicable for e'one. I agree. There is a point of interest for us here in that there is arguably an imperative when it comes to protecting the right of people with disabilities online, or those who may be classed as vulnerable. I think this is where we could lead the charge by further exploring the potential impact of fingerprinting and how it relates to profiling people with disabilities, if we can come up with ways of ensuring that the integrity of the user is maintained throughout for people with disabilities, my point is this may lead to interesting benefits for the 'ordinary' end user. I think this is the use case (protecting the integrity of disability related user data) - that could catch attention, headlines etc rather like the traveling animal one in verifiable claims. Janina also expressed the interesting nature of these technologies that they are neither good or bad - it is how they are used that is important. But to paraphrase some other clever guy, neither are they neutral. Thanks Josh -- Emerging Web Technology Specialist/Accessibility (WAI/W3C)
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2020 11:56:08 UTC