- From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 04:20:35 -0400
- To: public-rqtf@w3.org
Colleagues: This message proposes a resolution to the multi-lingual erratum brought to our attention here: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rqtf/2019Aug/0067.html Looking at the context of the statement which drew the above criticism, I note that it occurs in Section 2, our discussion of Stand-Alone Solutions. More specifically our incorrect assertion comes as we describe various challenges attendant on audio captcha. I think we can reasonably assume our readers will understand that many of these same analysis also apply in the context of Section 3: Multi-Party Approaches, though we certainly don't repeat our analysis, nor list out our findings afresh for the Multi-Party context. Given this I propose we publish an Errata Update to our document making the following two edits: 1.) We should considerqualifying our categorical assertion with the phrase: "As of this writing." 2.) We should add the sord "stand-alone" to our categorical statement. The edited paragraph in Section 2.1.2 would then read as follows: Unfortunately, non English audio CAPTCHAs appear to be very rare indeed. As of this writing we are aware of only one stand-alone multilingual CAPTCHA solution provider with support for a significant number of the world's languages." Best, Janina -- Janina Sajka Linux Foundation Fellow Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa
Received on Monday, 21 October 2019 08:20:39 UTC