- From: Joshue O Connor <joconnor@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 12:49:57 +0000
- To: "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org>, RQTF <public-rqtf@w3.org>
Hi Jason and all, I'm looking forward to our post Inclusive XR workshop call. A couple of extra items to discuss today around XAUR. 1) We have some new user needs! Based on some discussion at the workshop and collective brainstorming etc. Very happy about that. I've added them to the XAUR. [1] [1] https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Xaur_draft 2)The current XAUR is getting rather large and unwieldy - I want do discuss editing it down so that it focuses exclusively on user need/requirements etc. IMO it would be preferable to move other 'parts' of it to separate documents. For example, the XR Object Semantics Module could that be removed to its own document? IMO, yes and doing this may help focus the discussion around semantics, and could be linked heavily to the user needs content of the existing XAUR. We would have more documents and I know the group is not totally keen on that, but I feel we need focussed discussion on different parts of the stack to make effective progress. 3) To start this process - I've already removed the draft 'XAUR checkpoints' - which we have not reviewed in RQTF anyway at this point. I've moved those to a separate page for the moment. They could be used by Silver or AGWG as required. 4) I've also removed the draft XR Media requirements checklist reference, and examples, as really this muddies the water in the XAUR. Looking forward to discussing later! Josh -- Emerging Web Technology Specialist/Accessibility (WAI/W3C)
Received on Wednesday, 13 November 2019 12:46:52 UTC