W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rqtf@w3.org > January 2019

RE: Final reCAPTCHA Tweaks

From: Scott Hollier <scott@hollier.info>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:09:21 +0000
To: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, David Sloan <dsloan@paciellogroup.com>
CC: Research Questions Task Force <public-rqtf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <SN6PR01MB4349F8F4ED0073E094FAEF70DC9A0@SN6PR01MB4349.prod.exchangelabs.com>
To Janina

+1 from me after Dave's minor edits and typos fixed up. Great work Janina, fits in very nicely. 

Scot.t 

Dr Scott Hollier 
Digital Access Specialist 
Mobile: +61 (0)430 351 909
Web: www.hollier.info
 
Technology for everyone
 
Looking to upskill your staff with digital access training? Fill the room for one flat fee. 
 
Keep up with digital access news by following @scotthollier on Twitter and subscribing to Scott’s newsletter. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> 
Sent: Thursday, 24 January 2019 8:29 PM
To: David Sloan <dsloan@paciellogroup.com>
Cc: Research Questions Task Force <public-rqtf@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Final reCAPTCHA Tweaks

Thanks, David. Suggested changes applied--and a few more edits! <grin>

Best,

Janina

David Sloan writes:
> Hi Janina
> 
> That's a very neat solution to the problem you identified, and I think it reads well! I read § 4.1 and note the following:
> 
> Suggested rewording:
> * para 4: “adjudged” rather than “adjudicated”?
> * para 7: wondering whether we need to include “only” in the passage: "it only assists Google in acquiring more user data”?
> 
> Typos:
> * para 4: s/promissing/promising
> * para 7: s/loathe/loath
> 
> Dave
> 
> > On 24 Jan 2019, at 10:57, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote:
> > 
> > Colleagues:
> > 
> > Following our conversation yesterday, I have made the changes we 
> > discussed.
> > 
> > The major change is that I dropped Sec. 4.3 Multi Devices, and moved 
> > that discussion into the section on reCAPTCHA.
> > 
> > The "aha" moment for me came during the APA call yesterday, when 
> > Michael asked whether any service other than Google provided 
> > cross-site CAPTCHA services. Afaik, only Google does that. 
> > Therefore, the distinction between authenticating a paticular user, 
> > something that many large services like Facebook do for third 
> > parties, and distinguishing humans from robots as a cross-site service needed to be made in context.
> > 
> > Please review that section, if you can't review any other. I'd like 
> > to go to APA CfC later today.
> > 
> > https://raw.githack.com/w3c/apa/js-captcha/captcha/index.html#the-go

> > ogle-recaptcha
> > 
> > Best,
> > 
> > Janina
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > Janina Sajka
> > 
> > Linux Foundation Fellow
> > Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup:	http://a11y.org

> > 
> > The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
> > Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures	http://www.w3.org/wai/apa

> > 
> > 
> 
> --
> David Sloan
> --
> UX Research Lead
> The Paciello Group
> https://www.paciellogroup.com

> 
> A Vispero Company
> https://vispero.com

> --
> This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message from your system and notify us immediately.
> Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or omitted to be taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this message is prohibited and may be unlawful.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 

Janina Sajka

Linux Foundation Fellow
Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup:	http://a11y.org


The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures	http://www.w3.org/wai/apa



Received on Thursday, 24 January 2019 13:09:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 17 January 2023 20:26:45 UTC