RE: XAUR - User requirements for augmentd and virtual reality - general comments

I agree there are multiple efforts underway (Silver, WCAG 2.x, FAST, etc.) with different objectives and scope, and that we need to determine how best to document XR-related requirements in this context.

I welcome Josh's addition of proposed agenda for discussion tomorrow.

-----Original Message-----
From: Joshue O Connor <>
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2019 7:05 AM
To: White, Jason J <>;
Subject: Re: XAUR - User requirements for augmentd and virtual reality - general comments

On 26/08/2019 15:50, White, Jason J wrote:

> A note on what currently isn’t addressed by WCAG 2.x would also be useful, but perhaps not essential.

This could be in the form of a roadmap. To do this successfully IMO we need to be clear on the purpose of FAST and how it relates to any XR user requirements, where existing WCAG SCs are applicable in XR, what is coming in WCAG 2.2 and what aspects of XR Silver should focus on.



Emerging Web Technology Specialist/Accessibility (WAI/W3C)


This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.

Thank you for your compliance.


Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2019 19:11:08 UTC