- From: Scott Hollier <scott@hollier.info>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:36:35 +0000
- To: David Sloan <dsloan@paciellogroup.com>, Research Questions Task Force <public-rqtf@w3.org>
To Dave That's fantastic, thanks heaps for that! Scott. Dr Scott Hollier Digital Access Specialist Mobile: +61 (0)430 351 909 Web: www.hollier.info Technology for everyone WCAG 2.1 has arrived – is your organisation ready? Keep up-to-date by following @scotthollier on Twitter and subscribing to Scott’s digital access newsletter. -----Original Message----- From: David Sloan <dsloan@paciellogroup.com> Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2018 7:04 PM To: Research Questions Task Force <public-rqtf@w3.org> Subject: Re: Mathematics accessibility references - update Hi all I’ve added Jason’s additional math references to the STEM domain-specific wiki page, formatted all references and grouped them into categories. Please feel free to review and suggest alternative groupings to help our review work. Scott—I also took your music references and created a separate page for those: https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/task-forces/research-questions/wiki/Music_Literature_Review Both the STEM and Music literature review pages are available from a Domain-specific notation index page: https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/task-forces/research-questions/wiki/Domain-specific_notation Dave > On 26 Sep 2018, at 01:23, White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote: > > By way of update in advance of the meeting: I verified citations of many of the relevant papers cited in the following two survey articles, and discovered a few more while doing so. > However, I still need to search for more recent references, and, of course, read the papers themselves. > > Archambault, D. (2009). Non visual access to mathematical contents: State of the art and prospective. In Proceedings of the WEIMS Conference (Vol. 2009, pp. 43-52). > > Karshmer, A., Gupta, G., & Pontelli, E. (2007, February). Mathematics and accessibility: A survey. In Proc. 9th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs (Vol. 3118, pp. 664-669). > Chicago > > For discussion at the meeting: we may need to define and clarify our scope. Nonvisual access to mathematical notation alone is the subject of a small but significant literature. I’m sure the same is true of access to graphical content. If we extend the survey to include education-related references, the body of literature will grow accordingly. > > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. > > > Thank you for your compliance. > -- David Sloan -- UX Research Lead The Paciello Group https://www.paciellogroup.com A VFO™ Company http://www.vfo-group.com/ -- This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message from your system and notify us immediately. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or omitted to be taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this message is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2018 12:37:01 UTC