W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rqtf@w3.org > May 2017

Re: Another way forward? (Just an idea for discussion)

From: Liam R. E. Quin <liam@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 13:01:07 -0400
Message-ID: <1493830867.28173.9.camel@w3.org>
To: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>, public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, W3C WAI Accessible Platform Architectures <public-apa@w3.org>, public-rqtf@w3.org, DPUB mailing list <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 10:50 -0500, John Foliot wrote:
> I began to wonder aloud if using a similar mechanism (up to, and
> including piggy-backing on the Digital Publishing's IG concept of
> 'manifest' above) might not be a more efficient and economical way of
> capturing and conveying *personalization options* at a site-wide
> level (as opposed to the "page" or single-screen
> level).

It might be; there's some dissent within the epub group(s) about
whether a manifest is needed for pwp or could simply be LINK elements
from an HTML file at the root.

But for sure it's a concept worth considering.


Liam R. E. Quin <liam@w3.org>
The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
Received on Wednesday, 3 May 2017 17:01:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 17 January 2023 20:26:44 UTC