- From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:22:07 -0500
- To: public-rqtf@w3.org
Minutes from the first teleconference of the Research Questions Task Force on 16 November are provided below as text. They're also available as hypertext at: http://www.w3.org/2016/11/16-rqtf-minutes.html W3C - DRAFT - SV_MEETING_TITLE 16 Nov 2016 See also: IRC log Attendees Present Janina, sloandr, Scott, David_Sloan, Gottfried Regrets Chair SV_MEETING_CHAIR Scribe Janina Contents * Topics 1. Introductions 2. Workplan Discussion 3. Web Authentication 4. Coordination with WCAG 5. Next call * Summary of Action Items * Summary of Resolutions _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ <scribe> scribe: Janina Introductions [people are introducing themselves] Workplan Discussion jw: Consists of ideas that arose from APA discussions ... Topics include authentication (also including captcha); personalization, ... ... Methodological advice for Silver (from WCAG); ... https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/task-forces/research-questions/work-statement Workplan URI is ... sh: Interested about including apps, is that in scope? jw: Notes WCAG has an active Mobile Accessibility TF ... They're developing requirements for WCAG 2.1 and beyond sh: Example of interest is virtual reality and how that could help pwds jb: Notes we should look at the Work Statement for scoping questions ... https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/task-forces/research-questions/work-statement jb: Notes that VR not currently up for WCAG 2.1, but hopes it is for Silver janina: Noting her view that any tech using http is in scope -- browsers being a general user instance; and apps being specific task instances Here's the Workplan: https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/task-forces/research-questions/wiki/Work_Plan jb: Notes the Silver work and apps are OK, but TF is more directly tied to APA's concerns ds: Recalling that rdwg was more driven by interests of participants, and likes that we're coordinating topics with other W3 work this time jw: Notes potential additions for the Workplan and we should discuss on list Web Authentication jw: There is interest around W3C, including around WAI to enhance how authentication is handled on the web ... APIs are being developed by a Web Authentication WG ... Would include biometrics, as well as multifactor ... We need to start thinking about the a11y implications of all these approaches ... We should look to inform W3 activity on this, and also related WCAG responses ... Suggest we need to identify prior research and pubs in this area janina: Notes the joint meeting during TPAC and that we were pointed to a developer group that implements specs in devices ... We neglected to scribe, but I will post that group's contact info jw: Anyone with experience in this area? Or interested in taking this on specifically? <jasonjgw> Janina: it was clear from the joint meeting that risk-based authentication was being promoted for use on the server. There are several ways of judging risk and different levels of confidence regarding the information provided by the client. jw: So, they call it "risk based authentication" ... Server acquires data from client, and these are factored along with other data, e.g. ip of the client Coordination with WCAG jw: Very interested in developing useful data gathering instruments to inform Silver ... So are keen on obtaining methodological guidance ... Also in developing comprehensive literature of relevance ... Want to coordinate with RQTF on these ds: I've already joined the Silver TF and would be happy to liaison for RQTF ... Discussion of authentication got me thinking about our own methodology in this group ... Should we be looking to develop a listing of a11y experts in various important areas of concern? ... So we would know who's working in a particular area? jb: Interesting suggestion. ... Hope we look in multiple communities, both in a11y and in the topic area itself ... Hope that we look at enough that this would become a fluid interaction and we would continue to reach out on each topic ds: Agree we shouldn't digress on this, just as a quick and basic help to get us going ... Noting that this might be a way to draw in more participation for the RQTF jw: Yes, if we know of contributors in general, or on a specific topic area, please contact and encourage their participation sh: What's the best process? Can we forward them to Jason jw: Notes the "participation" section in the Work Statement js: Also good to let Jason know, so we can track and help ds: Will try to come up with a few names of persons we might benefit from ... Should I email? Is there a wiki? jw: Likes the notion of a wiki in order to tie in publications, etc ... I'll volunteer to continue looking at authentication ... sh: Happy to get involved ds: Also Next call js: Suggesting 30 November sh: Will be flying, but regular sounds fine ... One hour earlier would be easier <sloandr> thanks, everyone! Summary of Action Items Summary of Resolutions [End of minutes] _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Found Scribe: Janina Present: Janina sloandr Scott David_Sloan Gottfried -- Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net Email: janina@rednote.net Linux Foundation Fellow Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:22:34 UTC