- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 08:23:11 -0400
- To: public-rif-wg@w3.org
- CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2012 12:23:39 UTC
Yesterday I said I'd look more into the Edited Recommendation process and report back. http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr#correction-classes explains that there are four kind of changes; the third kind is the sort we were worried about yesterday -- Michael's changes to FLD that disambiguate and might affect conformance. By this process, those are clearly allowed, and the review step is the review step we need to do anyway, issuing a Proposed Edited Recommendation (PER). So, we should do our work carefully, and get reviews of the editor's drafts, before doing the PER; but the PER is where the community gets to make sure we did that. -- Sandro
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2012 12:23:39 UTC