- From: Leora Morgenstern <leora@cs.nyu.edu>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:46:22 -0500
- To: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: "Leora Morgenstern" <leora@cs.nyu.edu>, "RIF WG" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Sandro, I'm happy to delay publishing by 6 weeks in order to get these all fixed. Leora On Tue, December 11, 2012 9:34 am, Sandro Hawke wrote: > On 12/11/2012 09:29 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote: >> On 12/11/2012 07:54 AM, Leora Morgenstern wrote: >>> What is the other option? Just turning it in in a month? >> >> Yes, >> >>> Are we guaranteed >>> that it will get published then? >> >> That shouldn't be a problem. >> >> I'm still looking at doing it today. There were lots of bad links >> -- they are all in the examples which are not displayed until you >> press the button to have them displayed. >> >> But I see that button isn't displayed either -- is that on purpose, or >> did something break? > > Specifically, it seems to have been commented out with the comment > > <!-- do not skip a line > > > which is ... odd. > > I see the examples are only present for some of the use cases, and in > some of them are rendered oddly, with extra spacing between lines. > > -- Sandro > > >> >> -- Sandro >> >>> Leora >>> >>> On Tue, December 11, 2012 6:31 am, Sandro Hawke wrote: >>>> >>>> Leora Morgenstern <leora@cs.nyu.edu> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, December 9, 2012 7:31 pm, Sandro Hawke wrote: >>>>>> On 12/09/2012 07:19 PM, Leora Morgenstern wrote: >>>>>>> Sandro, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I believe that the edits were reviewed, but it was on my to-do list >>>>> to >>>>>>> check the email archives to confirm this, and I haven't yet done >>>>> that. >>>>>>> If >>>>>>> I can get to that by Wednesday, would that be enough to publish for >>>>> this >>>>>>> year? >>>>>> The plan is to publish Tuesday morning. We could do UCR as it is >>>>> now, >>>>>> and revise it when the PERs go to REC in ~6 weeks, or just do UCR >>>>> then. >>>>>> -- Sandro >>>>> Let's do UCR as it is now. We may not even need to revise it in 6 >>>>> weeks. >>>> Its a bit late - the documents are supposed to be ready in advance, >>>> so I >>>> already turned them in, and now the webmaster would have to process >>>> them >>>> again. Hmmm. >>>> >>>> I can try. Other opinions? Has anyone else looked at the >>>> changes? Can >>>> you now? >>>> >>>> - Sandro >>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Leora >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Leora >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, December 9, 2012 6:42 pm, Sandro Hawke wrote: >>>>>>>> Is UCR ready to publish? Will it be in a few weeks? There >>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>> edits done in 2010 that never got published; it's unclear to me if >>>>> they >>>>>>>> ever got reviewed, etc. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- Sandro >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >>>> >>> >> > > -- Leora Morgenstern, Ph.D. Senior Scientist and Technical Fellow, SAIC, Arlington, VA http://www-formal.stanford.edu/leora 703.216.1473
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2012 14:46:55 UTC