- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:29:27 -0500
- To: Leora Morgenstern <leora@cs.nyu.edu>
- CC: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
On 12/11/2012 07:54 AM, Leora Morgenstern wrote:
> What is the other option? Just turning it in in a month?
Yes,
> Are we guaranteed
> that it will get published then?
That shouldn't be a problem.
I'm still looking at doing it today. There were lots of bad links --
they are all in the examples which are not displayed until you press the
button to have them displayed.
But I see that button isn't displayed either -- is that on purpose, or
did something break?
-- Sandro
> Leora
>
> On Tue, December 11, 2012 6:31 am, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>>
>> Leora Morgenstern <leora@cs.nyu.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, December 9, 2012 7:31 pm, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>>>> On 12/09/2012 07:19 PM, Leora Morgenstern wrote:
>>>>> Sandro,
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe that the edits were reviewed, but it was on my to-do list
>>> to
>>>>> check the email archives to confirm this, and I haven't yet done
>>> that.
>>>>> If
>>>>> I can get to that by Wednesday, would that be enough to publish for
>>> this
>>>>> year?
>>>> The plan is to publish Tuesday morning. We could do UCR as it is
>>> now,
>>>> and revise it when the PERs go to REC in ~6 weeks, or just do UCR
>>> then.
>>>> -- Sandro
>>> Let's do UCR as it is now. We may not even need to revise it in 6
>>> weeks.
>> Its a bit late - the documents are supposed to be ready in advance, so I
>> already turned them in, and now the webmaster would have to process them
>> again. Hmmm.
>>
>> I can try. Other opinions? Has anyone else looked at the changes? Can
>> you now?
>>
>> - Sandro
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Leora
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Leora
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, December 9, 2012 6:42 pm, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>>>>>> Is UCR ready to publish? Will it be in a few weeks? There were
>>>>>> edits done in 2010 that never got published; it's unclear to me if
>>> they
>>>>>> ever got reviewed, etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- Sandro
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>> --
>> Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2012 14:29:41 UTC