Re: RIF FAQ

Christian,
you should familiarize yourself with the spec. :-)

The presentation syntax in Core and BLD is explicitly normative.
Only PRD says *its* presentation syntax is not normative.
This is a *bug,* but I will not try to dissuade you.

michael


On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 07:58:02 -0700
Christian De Sainte Marie <csma@fr.ibm.com> wrote:

> sandro@w3.org wrote on 24/06/2010 06:43:24:
> > > 
> > > RIF specification itself employes a presentation syntax, which is 
> > normative and
> > > is used in definitions and examples. However, it is ''not'' 
> recommended for
> > > exchange among different rule systems.
> > 
> > But that's not true, is it?   BLD and PRD use different presentation
> > syntaxes, don't they?  (At least, PRD uses "if" and "then" while BLD
> > uses ":-".)
> 
> And the PS is not normative: only the XML syntax is. All three specs 
> (Core, BLD and PRD) are explicit about that.
> 
> Christian
> 
> IBM
> 9 rue de Verdun
> 94253 - Gentilly cedex - FRANCE
> Tel. +33 1 49 08 35 00
> Fax +33 1 49 08 35 10
> 
> Sauf indication contraire ci-dessus:/ Unless stated otherwise above:
> Compagnie IBM France
> Siege Social : 17 avenue de l'Europe, 92275 Bois-Colombes Cedex
> RCS Nanterre 552 118 465
> Forme Sociale : S.A.S.
> Capital Social : 611.451.766,20 ?
> SIREN/SIRET : 552 118 465 03644
>

Received on Thursday, 24 June 2010 16:27:29 UTC