- From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.stonybrook.edu>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:40:02 -0400
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- CC: public-rif-wg <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 07:07:10 -0700 Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote: > > Also, please read over the RIF FAQ and make sure you still like the > answers. I expect it will get some readers today. > > http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/RIF_FAQ Thanks, Sandro. A very good FAQ. Couple of comments: In 1.2, I suggest to add the following after the last sentence: An overview of the RIF architecture can be found [http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Overview here]. Links to unofficial, community-contributed RIF dialects can be found [http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/RIF_FLD_Dialects here]. In 1.6: "Various presentation syntaxes..." I suggest: RIF specification itself employes a presentation syntax, which is normative and is used in definitions and examples. However, it is ''not'' recommended for exchange among different rule systems. michael
Received on Tuesday, 22 June 2010 19:40:37 UTC