- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 05:58:16 -0700
- To: Christian De Sainte Marie <csma@fr.ibm.com>
- Cc: public-rif-wg <public-rif-wg@w3.org>, public-rif-wg-request@w3.org
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 05:51 -0500, Christian De Sainte Marie wrote:
>
> Hi Sandro,
>
> Sandro wrote on 22/06/2010 01:15:16:
> >
> > Please look over the docs asap for any showstopper problems. I
> think
> > some of the changelogs are slightly wrong (not updated for Rec).
>
> Going back to when do we have to track changes in the change log? PR,
> CR, LC?
>
> If it is PR and there is no change do we leave the empty changelog, or
> do we remove the section altogether?
I think there should always be a changelog, even if it says "No
changes." I would keep enough of a changelog to have 5-20 items or 1/4
to 1/2 a page, if printed. If it's much longer than that, I'd trim it
to the changes of just the most recent publication round(s).
This is supported by the SOTD text, as in:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/REC-rif-bld-20100622/#status-changes
-- Sandro
Received on Tuesday, 22 June 2010 12:58:22 UTC