Re: canonical XML from Stella Mitchell on 2010-02-21 (public-rif-wg@w3.org from February 2010)

From: Stella Mitchell <stellamit@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:33:05 -0500
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <d64b0f2c1002210633y540e2443iafb81dfc3ff543f5@mail.gmail.com>

I put this back to Proposed state and added pointers to the discussions so
far.

Stella

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:

>
> It looks like our test case on XMLLiteral today was wrong; the value
> space has to be in canonical form, which avoids the weirdness we were
> seeing.
>
>    -- Sandro
>
>

Received on Sunday, 21 February 2010 14:33:38 UTC