- From: Adrian Paschke <adrian.paschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 13:58:56 +0200
- To: "'Christian De Sainte Marie'" <csma@fr.ibm.com>
- Cc: "'RIF'" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <01a301c9d879$300c3a80$9024af80$@paschke@gmx.de>
Christian, Please find below how I addressed your editorial comments. @Core Editors: Please check if you are fine with the changes which I made. -Adrian >There is one that you will not need otake into account, because I remove it: > > - Section 1 (Overview): I wonder if, since Import is part of the normative syntax and semantics >, we should not make it explicit, and stress it, that Core includes SWC (and that is true for BLD > and PRD as well, of course); Ok >- Beside my usual rant about the presentation syntax (ask anybody who's >not spend about 4 years bickering about the RIF presentation syntax to >read the first two sentences of section 2: if they understand that the >concrete PS is not normative, they must be very clever - well, if they >understand anything at all, that is :-)... The presentation syntax is not the same as the EBNF syntax. Presentation syntax is a superconcept for both mathematical English and EBNF syntax. It is now explicitly described in section 2. - Beside my usual rant about the presentation syntax, I said, I suggest that section 3 be renamed "RIF-Core as a specialisation of RIF-BLD", and that section 6 (RIF-Core as a specialisation of RIF-PRD) be moved next to it (that is, to become section 3); I move section 6 before section 3 since it describes the presentation syntax of RIF Core as a specialization of RIF PRD. - I would also move what is currently the first paragraph of section 2 into the overview (esp. if the section is renamed as suggested); I think the mathematical presentation syntax is important enough to have it here before the section about semnatics and safeness. - talking of section 6 (RIF-Core as a specialisation of RIF-PRD): it might be a good idea to point to the section Interoperability in RIF-PRD [1] Done - Sub-sections 2.6.1 to 2.6.3 seem very detailled wrt the rest of the document, and esp. the normative parts of it. I suggest removing the subsections, mentioning only once the EBNF for RIF-Core presentation syntax is a specialisation of RIF-BLD presentation syntax, and append the three paragraphs about examples 2-4. Btw, the EBNF for the RIF-Core PS is also a specialisation of the EBNF for RIF-PRD PS. Currently, it reflects the modular design of RIF Core consisting of a condition language, a rule language and a core annotations and the one to one mapping to the corresponding BLD parts can be easily seen. I tend to keep that clear structure, also because beside 3 headings and two sentences it will not safe much text. However, I do not object to your proposal if the other editors also would like to have it less detailed. Von: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rif-wg-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Christian De Sainte Marie Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Mai 2009 10:04 An: Adrian Paschke Cc: 'RIF' Betreff: Re: AW: [Core] Review Core ********* NOTICE ********** My new email address at IBM is: csma@fr.ibm.com My ILOG email address will not be forwarded after June 8 ***************************** Hi Adrian, "Adrian Paschke" <adrian.paschke@gmx.de> wrote on 19/05/2009 01:23:45: > > So far, I have implemented all required changes and will try to > address the editorial ones tomorrow. There is one that you will not need otake into account, because I remove it: > > - Section 1 (Overview): I wonder if, since Import is part of the normative syntax and semantics >, we should not make it explicit, and stress it, that Core includes SWC (and that is true for BLD > and PRD as well, of course); That is not true, of course. Core/BLD/PRD do not include SWC by reference; they refer correctly to other specs, including SWC, for non-RIF import; Cheers, Christian ILOG, an IBM Company 9 rue de Verdun 94253 - Gentilly cedex - FRANCE Tel. +33 1 49 08 35 00 Fax +33 1 49 08 35 10 Sauf indication contraire ci-dessus:/ Unless stated otherwise above: Compagnie IBM France Siège Social : Tour Descartes, 2, avenue Gambetta, La Défense 5, 92400 Courbevoie RCS Nanterre 552 118 465 Forme Sociale : S.A.S. Capital Social : 609.751.783,30 € SIREN/SIRET : 552 118 465 02430
Received on Tuesday, 19 May 2009 11:59:38 UTC