- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 02:49:25 +0100
- To: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
DTB is ready for review. Some removed Editor's notes in DTB haven't been discussed in today's telecon: {{EdNote|text=<tt>pred:literal-not-identical</tt> does not depend on a specific intended domain, such as the union of all value spaces of datatypes supported by the dialect at hand, for its arguments but instead is false in case an argument is outside the value spaces of the supported datatypes. The implications on this regarding extensibility are still being discussed, see also http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Apr/0036.html}} Has been addressed with the latest version of that predicate as suggested by Jos/Michael. {{EdNote|text=The formulation of the clause on namespace-reuse is under discussion, for instance, whether we shall allow guards and negative guards for all of the XML Schema primitive datatypes under the <tt>pred:</tt> namespace.}} This editor's note on the naming of guards and negative guards have been resolved with the naming agreed in the last f2f. {{EdNote|text=Due to the subtle differences in casting, e.g., concerning error handling, between RIF and <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[#ref-xpath-functions|XPath-Functions]]], the definitions of cast functions might still need refinement in terms of defining the domains in future versions of this draft. Also, the definition of the mappings need refinement. See [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Nov/0067.html e-mail], esp. the response to item 6)}} Casting has been reworked completely, thus this Ednote is obsolete. The remaining Editor's notes have been addressed as discussed in today's Telecon, an additional remark to one of those editor's notes below, regardiong ACTION-811: {{EdNote|text=Note that [http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-xpath-functions-20070123/#casting-from-primitive-to-primitive Section 17.1] of <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[#ref-xpath-functions|XPath-Functions]]] says that for datatypes that do not have a canonical lexical representation defined an '''implementation dependent''' canonical representation may be used. We probably do not want that. This remark probably applies to subtypes of xs:string.}} What is affected here is casts from double and float to string, cf. http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-xpath-functions-20070123/#casting-to-string The strawman proposal to address this is now in the separate section on casts to xs:string. As for the editor's notes regarding ACTION-813, I will send a separate mail. best, Axel -- Dr. Axel Polleres Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Wednesday, 13 May 2009 01:50:08 UTC