- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 02:49:25 +0100
- To: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
DTB is ready for review.
Some removed Editor's notes in DTB haven't been discussed in today's
telecon:
{{EdNote|text=<tt>pred:literal-not-identical</tt>
does not depend on a specific intended domain, such as the union of all
value spaces of datatypes supported by the dialect at hand, for its
arguments but instead is false in case an argument is outside the value
spaces of the supported datatypes. The implications on this regarding
extensibility are still being discussed, see also
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Apr/0036.html}}
Has been addressed with the latest version of that predicate as
suggested by Jos/Michael.
{{EdNote|text=The formulation of the clause on namespace-reuse is under
discussion, for instance, whether we shall allow guards and negative
guards for all of the XML Schema primitive datatypes under the
<tt>pred:</tt> namespace.}}
This editor's note on the naming of guards and negative guards have been
resolved with the naming agreed in the last f2f.
{{EdNote|text=Due to the subtle differences in casting, e.g., concerning
error handling, between RIF and
<nowiki>[</nowiki>[[#ref-xpath-functions|XPath-Functions]]], the
definitions of cast functions might still need refinement in terms of
defining the domains in future versions of this draft. Also, the
definition of the mappings need refinement. See
[http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Nov/0067.html
e-mail], esp. the response to item 6)}}
Casting has been reworked completely, thus this Ednote is obsolete.
The remaining Editor's notes have been addressed as discussed in today's
Telecon, an additional remark to one of those editor's notes below,
regardiong ACTION-811:
{{EdNote|text=Note that
[http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-xpath-functions-20070123/#casting-from-primitive-to-primitive
Section 17.1] of
<nowiki>[</nowiki>[[#ref-xpath-functions|XPath-Functions]]] says that
for datatypes that do not have a canonical lexical representation
defined an '''implementation dependent''' canonical representation may
be used. We probably do not want that. This remark probably applies to
subtypes of xs:string.}}
What is affected here is casts from double and float to string,
cf.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-xpath-functions-20070123/#casting-to-string
The strawman proposal to address this is now in the separate section on
casts to xs:string.
As for the editor's notes regarding ACTION-813, I will send a separate mail.
best,
Axel
--
Dr. Axel Polleres
Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland,
Galway
email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Wednesday, 13 May 2009 01:50:08 UTC