Friday, 27 February 2009
- Re: ISSUE-92: n-ary builtins
- Re: ISSUE-80: Meta builtins
- Re: ISSUE-92: n-ary builtins
- Re: ISSUE-92: n-ary builtins
- ISSUE-80: Meta builtins
- ISSUE-92: n-ary builtins
- Postdoc position on Description Logics and Rules in Bozen-Bolzano (Italy)
- ISSUE-93: datatype IRI mapping
Wednesday, 25 February 2009
- CFP: 4th AIS SigPrag Int. Conf. Track on the PragmaticWeb at i-Semantics 2009 (ICPW 2009)
- DEADLINE EXTENSION: IEEE TKDE Special Issue on Rules
Tuesday, 24 February 2009
- [RIF] draft minutes RIF Telephone Conference 24/02/2009
- RE: [PRD] PRD TF telecon February 24 cancelled
- RE: [PRD] PRD TF telecon February 24 cancelled
Monday, 23 February 2009
- Re: notes from Presentation Syntax task force meeting
- [PRD] PRD TF telecon February 24 cancelled
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon February 24
Sunday, 22 February 2009
- Re: notes from Presentation Syntax task force meeting
- Re: notes from Presentation Syntax task force meeting
Friday, 20 February 2009
- notes from Presentation Syntax task force meeting
- Re: Presentation task force telecon
- Re: Presentation task force telecon
Thursday, 19 February 2009
Wednesday, 18 February 2009
- Re: Alan Ruttenberg: Re: notes from OWL and RIF datatype coordination meeting
- Re: [F2F] F2F13 will be 15-17 April in Cambridge, MA
- [F2F] F2F13 will be 15-17 April in Cambridge, MA
- Re: Alan Ruttenberg: Re: notes from OWL and RIF datatype coordination meeting
Tuesday, 17 February 2009
- [Admin] Draft Minutes from 17-Feb-2009 RIF Telecon
- Re: [PRD] PRD TF telecon Tuesday 17 February
- [PRD] notes from PRD TF 17 Feb
- ISSUE-93 (Datatype IRIs): Should datatype IRIs map to the datatypes themselves [BLD]
- Presentation task force telecon
- Re: [PRD] PRD TF telecon Tuesday 17 February
- RE: [PRD] PRD TF telecon Tuesday 17 February
- Re: [RDF-OWL] what if there are no graphs at import locations?
Monday, 16 February 2009
- [PRD] PRD TF telecon Tuesday 17 February
- Re: notes from OWL and RIF datatype coordination meeting
- Re: notes from OWL and RIF datatype coordination meeting
- [Admin] Agenda RIF teleon February 17
Sunday, 15 February 2009
- Re: Alan Ruttenberg: Re: notes from OWL and RIF datatype coordination meeting
- Re: merged presentation syntax (MPS)
Saturday, 14 February 2009
- Alan Ruttenberg: Re: notes from OWL and RIF datatype coordination meeting
- Re: merged presentation syntax (MPS)
- Re: merged presentation syntax (MPS)
- Re: merged presentation syntax (MPS)
- Re: merged presentation syntax (MPS)
Friday, 13 February 2009
- merged presentation syntax (MPS)
- conformance in the face of decimals with lengths larger than supported by the implementation
- Re: [RDF-OWL] what if there are no graphs at import locations?
- Re: [RDF-OWL] what if there are no graphs at import locations?
- Re: [RDF-OWL] what if there are no graphs at import locations?
- Re: [RDF-OWL] what if there are no graphs at import locations?
- Re: [RDF-OWL] what if there are no graphs at import locations?
- RE: [PRD] Notes from F2F meeting 11 February
Thursday, 12 February 2009
- Re: [PRD] Notes from F2F meeting 11 February
- [PRD] Notes from F2F meeting 11 February
- [RDF-OWL] what if there are no graphs at import locations?
- AW: Action 695 argument
- Re: Action 695 argument
Wednesday, 11 February 2009
- Re: Action 695 argument
- Re: Action 695 argument
- Re: [DTB] ACTION 704 completed
- Re: [DTB] ACTION 704 completed
- Re: [DTB] ACTION 704 completed
- Re: [DTB] ACTION 704 completed
- Re: Action 695 argument
- Re: [Core] ACTION-703: More sophisticated notions of safety
- Regrets for TeleConf 17/02/2009
- [Core] ACTION-703: More sophisticated notions of safety
Tuesday, 10 February 2009
- [DTB] ACTION 704 completed
- [Admin] RIF telecon minutes, 10 Feb 2009
- Re: Action 695 argument
- [PRD] Notes from the PRD TF telecon Tuesday 10 February
- Re: Action 695 argument
- Re: Action 695 argument
- poll on Madrid vs Boston for RIF F2F 13
- W3C Membership Survey
- Re: [XTAN] A limited extensibility mechanism (but extensible)
- Re: Action 695 argument
- [PRD] Semantic Problems
- Re: [XTAN] A limited extensibility mechanism (but extensible)
- Re: Action 695 argument
Monday, 9 February 2009
- [PRD] PRD meeting at ILOG Wednesday 11
- [PRD] PRD TF telecon Tuesday 10 February
- XML Schema 1.1 LCWD
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon February 10
- Re: notes from OWL and RIF datatype coordination meeting
- notes from OWL and RIF datatype coordination meeting
- AW: Last call for hosting proposals
- OWL+RIF coordination meeting on datatypes
Friday, 6 February 2009
- [XTAN] A limited extensibility mechanism (but extensible)
- Minutes from Feb. 3rd
- Re: [Core] updated safeness condition
- Re: [Core] updated safeness condition
- Partial regrets for telecon 10 Feb
- Re: Action 695 argument
Thursday, 5 February 2009
Wednesday, 4 February 2009
- Re: Action 692: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/actions/692
- Action 692: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/actions/692
- RE: [Core] updated safeness condition
- Re: [Core] updated safeness condition
- RE: ACTION-579 Done (Implement RIF-XML to PS translate)
- RE: [Core] updated safeness condition
- RE: Action 695 argument
- Last call for hosting proposals
- RE: ACTION-579 Done (Implement RIF-XML to PS translate)
- Re: Action 695 argument
Tuesday, 3 February 2009
- Example not-necessarily-terminating rules
- [Core] updated safeness condition
- Re: implementation of the decision to remove external frames
- Re: [Core] new safeness condition
- Re: ACTION-579 Done (Implement RIF-XML to PS translate)
- Re: [Core] new safeness condition
- ACTION-579 Done (Implement RIF-XML to PS translate)
- RE: Action 695 argument
- RE: [PRD] PRD TF telecon --> issues 63/65/62/66 comments
- Re: Action 695 argument
- Re: [DTB] Action 681 completed
- Re: [DTB] Action 681 completed
Monday, 2 February 2009
- Re: [DTB] Action 681 completed
- [PRD] PRD TF telecon Tuesday 3 February
- Re: [RDF+OWL] impossible to coreify OWL 2 RL combinations
- [RDF+OWL] impossible to coreify OWL 2 RL combinations
- [RDF+OWL] coreifying RDF(S) combination embeddings
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 3 February
- Re: [DTB] Action 681 completed
- Re: [DTB] Action 681 completed
- Re: [Core] new safeness condition
- Re: [DTB] Action 681 completed
- [DTB] Action 681 completed