- From: Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:42:20 -0400
- To: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
I've collected the latest public comments (through this morning) on the main RIF wiki page in the same table as before (since, in point of fact, our previous public comments are public comments), and generated wiki pages for all of them and a few more obvious responses. Although the response was not overwhelming, all of the comments are supportive. In particular we have Support for equality in conclusion: 2 Implementations: 4 Support for future dialects: 6 Benjamin suggested the lack of a public response is because the specifications are simply non-controversial. Basically, there are some minor criticisms, which need to be addressed, but overall I think we are ready to go to CR. In my next message, I will propose a resolution for the next telecon. Minor critisisms that need to be addressed: Paul Fodor: My second comment/question is about equality. The core dialect only allows equality in rule premises which is puzzling to me because I don't see how is then used (how terms are 'defined' as equal). Ben Grosof: PRD is a good initial step but essentially has a procedural operational semantics rather than declarative model-theoretic semantics, thus is not "fully" semantic in that sense and does not support interoperability nearly as satisfactorily as logic dialects/approaches that do have such. Wolgang Launs message has a number of critical points. We've responded but will need to have him say he's satisified. Tom Gordon: RIF, like SWRL before it, define a bunch of "builtin" predicate and function symbols. I would have much preferred a more general and extensible method for attaching procedures, defined using existing programming langauges. Nick Bassiliades has some critical points about the XML that need to be addressed. -- Dr. Christopher A. Welty IBM Watson Research Center +1.914.784.7055 19 Skyline Dr. cawelty@gmail.com Hawthorne, NY 10532 http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty
Received on Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:43:05 UTC