- From: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:48:29 +0200
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Cc: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <546c6c1c0904162348v4713184dt5cf7d7dd36f366ad@mail.gmail.com>
Dear, On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:33 AM, Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>wrote: > If we refer to XML Schema 1.1 Datatypes, I assume we shall use: > > [XML-SCHEMA2] > W3C XML Schema Definition Language (XSD) 1.1 Part 2: Datatypes, D. > Peterson, S. Gao, A. Malhotra, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, H. S. Thompson > (Editors), W3C Working Draft, World Wide Web Consortium, 30 January 2009, . > Latest version available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/. > > - How is the policy here? Do we depend on them getting to rec before we can > get to rec? Yes In "Organize a Recommendation Track Transition", you can read [[ Does this specification have any normative references to W3C specifications that are not yet Proposed Recommendations? *Note:* In general, documents do not advance to Recommendation with normative references to W3C specifications that are not yet Recommendations. ]] > > - I assume the namespaces for XML Schema datatypes, i.e. > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema# > just remains the same (hopefully, anything else would mean trouble), > right? Well, it remains the same, but you have to remove the # sign It is only http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> But as before you can reference datatypes by doing http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#>#int Regards, Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Friday, 17 April 2009 06:49:04 UTC