- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:55:49 -0400
- cc: Christian De Sainte Marie <csma@fr.ibm.com>, public-rif-wg@w3.org
> A quick to-the-point answer (since it's Easter morning).... > > Although I'm not convinced it's a good use of our resources, I'm okay > with some fallback mechanism being specified AT RISK through the end of > CR, but I think we should say in the spec that if the fallback > mechanisms ends up not included, PRD producers will be told they SHOULD > translate to Core those rulesets which can be translated to core without > a significant observable change in semantics. (I'm not sure the best > way to say that, technically, in out specs, but I hope you know what I > mean.) Also, I think it does need to be FPWD before we publish the others at LCWD, so the reference can be made for conformance (and marked at risk, etc). I guess your current wiki page could be made publishable in the next week. -- Sandro
Received on Sunday, 12 April 2009 18:56:00 UTC