- From: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:13:50 +0200
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- CC: RIF <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
> >>>> The problem is easily solved for isLiteral(Not)OfType, once we define >>>> how types are represented (the second argument in the domain is >>>> restricted to the set of data types, i.e., all datatypes that have >>>> existed, currently exist, and will exist in the world), and it >>>> becomes a >>>> nonissue if we adopt my proposal [1] and revert back to individual >>>> guard >>>> predicates. >>> Uff. Please not! Sigh. ;-) >> >> What do you propose then? > > would dialect-tags per document work? This would mean that a dialect can never be a syntactical extension of another dialect. Therefore this option would probably be a nonstarter for many people. In addition, I think is complete overkill for resolving such a relatively minor issue. > going back to guards and dropping isLiteralOFType looks like a step back > to me. Well, it looks like a step forward to me :-) Jos
Received on Sunday, 12 April 2009 12:14:33 UTC