In completion of http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/actions/726 I removed all string comparison built-ins except pred:compare from DTB. This also seems to close ISSUE-67. In this context, we should probably strive next to also remove all the other newly invented comparison preds from DTB which don't have back-up in XPath/XQuery and resolve ISSUE-96 accordingly... This is also dependent on the discussions on literal-(not-)equal or literalNotIdentical, ... Is that now fine? Cf. http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/DTB#pred:literalNotIdentical Axel -- Dr. Axel Polleres Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 15:17:24 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:07:55 UTC