- From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:40:36 -0400
- To: "Hassan Ait-Kaci" <hak@ilog.com>
- Cc: <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 05:47:25 -0700 "Hassan Ait-Kaci" <hak@ilog.com> wrote: > Hello, > > In the light of the recent discussions regarding parsing the > RIF BLD into RIF XML, I would like to submit the following > to this WG to decide. > > I propose to change the current RIF BLD EBNF to: Hassan, #1 and #4 clash with the assumptions underlying PS&DTB. #3 is already in DTB, and I do not quite understand what you mean by #2. Re #1, double quotes are reserved for the abridged syntax for strings in DTB. The abridged syntax for IRIs is <...>. I do not understand what you are trying to achieve with #4. As far as I can see, it is not easy to reconcile this with PS, and I do not understand why do you need this particular change. --michael > 1. allow IRI's only within double quotes; > > 2. do not perform expansion of relative IRI's; > > 3. allow CURIE's everywhere as specified in the EBNF today > as CONSTSHORT's; > > 4. allow Name's to derive CURIE's. > > With the above simple amendments, I am confident that I can > specify a workable tokenizer and Jacc grammar for a new > version of my BLD->XML tool. > > In order to speed things up a bit, it would be nice if the > above issues could be settled soon, so that I can proceed > with the new release. I will be travelling starting > tomorrow and will spend the whole month of October working > in ILOG France. I will not attend this F2F in NYC - not > even remotely (in fact I will be in planes most of its > duration). I will attend the F2F debrief planned for next > Tuesday's telecon. Only after then will I have time to > start implementing the above amendments. > > Have a fun F2F in NY, NY (my kinda town!)... > > Cheers, > > -hak > -- > Hassan Aït-Kaci * ILOG, Inc. - Product Division R&D > http://koala.ilog.fr/wiki/bin/view/Main/HassanAitKaci >
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2008 22:41:16 UTC