- From: Hassan Ait-Kaci <hak@ilog.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 04:35:09 -0700
- To: "Dave Reynolds" <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2008 11:36:36 UTC
Dave Reynolds wrote: > I agree with Hassan that IRIs (as opposed to CURIs) should be explicitly > delimited in the PS to simplify parsing. I agree with Dave for agreeing with me! :-) > I also agree with Sandro that the PS parser should not resolve relative > IRIs but pass then in the XML. I agree with Sandro (and Dave) as well. > If you do need an IRI checker/resolver for some reason then Jena > includes an iri.jar which is available as a separate download and is > rather more comprehensive and up to date wrt the IRI specs than the Java > URI code (at least 1.4 code) [*]. > > Dave > > [*] At least according to Jeremy, the author of the IRI package. This is interesting - I'd be interested in having access to it if possible. Thanks. -hak -- Hassan Aït-Kaci * ILOG, Inc. - Product Division R&D http://koala.ilog.fr/wiki/bin/view/Main/HassanAitKaci
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2008 11:36:36 UTC