- From: Boley, Harold <Harold.Boley@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:27:09 -0400
- To: "RIF WG" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
All WG members are invited to join the next (second) Core telecon,
which from now on will be a taskforce telecon consisting of the
Core editors plus the WG members who want to join.
AGENDA Teleconference
W3C RIF-Core Taskforce
22 September 2008
North America and Europe are in daylight saving time:
Mondays 1500 UTC, 0800 (West US) 1100 (East US) 1600 (London) 1700
(Paris)
Duration: *normally 60 mins*
Zakim Bridges: +1.617.761.6200 (US), +33 4 89 06 34 99 (F?) or
+44.117.370.6152 (GB?)
Conference code: 74394 ("RIFWG")
Web-based IRC (member-only): as for main telecons
Agenda
* Admin (short)
* State of Core page with Editors notes [1]
* Open Core issues [2] and initial PROPOSED resolutions
(s. below) <--- 40 mins
* Further Core edits
Best,
Harold
[1] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Core
[2] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/issues/open
Please note that RIF-Core telecons are for attendance only by RIF
Working
Group Participants and guests invited by the chairs.
conference
------------------------------------------------------
The following are the current wordings of PROPOSED resolutions,
drafted by Core editors:
http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/issues/48
PROPOSED: Keep membership/subclass in Core
(maybe limiting these constructs to rule bodies).
http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/issues/70
PROPOSED: Parameterize the conformance clauses of Core with
safeness requirements "strict", "weak", and "none" (default: "none").
http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/issues/71
PROPOSED: Core should keep unrestricted equality and external function
calls in rule bodies and keep external functions calls in rule heads.
http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/issues/72
PROPOSED: Do not include Skolem functions or a 'New' builtin for Core
(a 'New' construct can be developed for PRD).
http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/issues/74
PROPOSED: Core should keep both frames/objects and
(positional-argument) predicates/relations.
http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/issues/75
PROPOSED: Core should keep disjunction in rule bodies (cf. Gary's UC).
http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/issues/76
PROPOSED: Core should keep unrestricted equality in rule bodies (cf.
ISSUE-71).
------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2008 16:27:52 UTC