- From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
- Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 12:24:35 -0400
- To: "Patrick Albert" <palbert@ilog.fr>
- Cc: "Chris Welty" <cawelty@gmail.com>, "Jos de Bruijn" <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>, "Adrian Paschke" <adrian.paschke@biotec.tu-dresden.de>, <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Patrick, you are thinking procedurally, while we are talking about *logic*. michael On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 13:54:06 +0200 "Patrick Albert" <palbert@ilog.fr> wrote: > CSMA's proposal might not fit the current use of frames in PRD, but it > relies on the fact that almost ALL modern production systems make the > distinction between attributes of objects that refer to ONE ATOMIC value > -- such as one Person's age -- and attributes of objects that refer A > SET of values -- such as one Person's parents. In this case the rules > might propose some syntax to refer the set as a value and some syntax to > iterate across the elements of the set.
Received on Thursday, 4 September 2008 16:26:06 UTC