- From: Alex Kozlenkov <alex.kozlenkov@betfair.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 21:12:33 +0100
- To: <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Gary, By two identical facts I mean facts that are identical up to OID. This is especially interesting in the context of CEP extensions that interpret incoming events as new facts. What I was trying to say is that normally, there is no control at all over how such facts satisfy the rules. Such situation may arise, for example, when there are event duplicates. -----Original Message----- From: Gary Hallmark [mailto:gary.hallmark@oracle.com] Sent: 03 September 2008 18:31 To: Alex Kozlenkov Cc: public-rif-wg@w3.org Subject: Re: Congratulations on Christian's and co. courage no such thing as 2 identical facts. Relations are sets. Frames have a unique OID. Note that PRD currently has no way to create a new object, and that is a problem we need to fix. Alex Kozlenkov wrote: > And one more comment about the minimality I'm discussing in my previous > post. This is not an idle question. If there exist two identical facts, > will there be two actions executed or only one? In the language dialect > for event processing that the JBoss guys are developing, I was trying to > understand whether A<=B,C given B and C matching incoming events, if C > was detected twice, would the action A be executed twice? What I mean is > that there may be situation when we want to only detect one situation so > that the sequence of events CCB should execute A only once. > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > In order to protect our email recipients, Betfair Group use SkyScan from > MessageLabs to scan all Incoming and Outgoing mail for viruses. > > ________________________________________________________________________ > > ________________________________________________________________________ In order to protect our email recipients, Betfair Group use SkyScan from MessageLabs to scan all Incoming and Outgoing mail for viruses. ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2008 20:13:36 UTC