- From: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
- Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 18:45:40 +0200
- To: kifer@cs.sunysb.edu
- CC: Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>, Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>, Adrian Paschke <adrian.paschke@biotec.tu-dresden.de>, public-rif-wg@w3.org
Michael Kifer wrote: > > On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:39:36 +0200 > Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr> wrote: > > >>Why not use = for frames instead, as in obj[prop = val]? >> >>As I suggested on IRC during last week's telecon, that would reflect the >>semantics that the frame is true iff the value of property 'prop' for object >>'obj' is equal to 'val'. > > > Such a frame is true NOT if the value is equal to val, but if the value of prop > CONTAINS val. Right. I forgot that. But my point about making it extensible to using other tests than equality remains. Christian
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2008 16:45:06 UTC