Tuesday, 30 September 2008
- Survey on F2F12 dates
- [Admin] F2F12 dates
- Re: [PRD] PRD task force telecon today
- RE: [PRD] PRD task force telecon today
- [PRD] PRD task force telecon today
- side/side vs. left/right
- public comment TK1
Monday, 29 September 2008
- [ADMIN] Minutes of 23 September 2008 RIF Telecon
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 30 September
- Response to JanM1
Saturday, 27 September 2008
- Re: not the negative guards alone cause pathologic examples!!!!...
- Re: not the negative guards alone cause pathologic examples!!!!...
- not the negative guards alone cause pathologic examples!!!!...
- Re: [Test case] disjunctive information from unsafe use of built-ins
- [Test case] disjunctive information from unsafe use of built-ins
- [PRD] conflict resolution slides
- Re: external frames
- Re: external frames
- Re: [Core] Definition of strict safeness
- DTB 2nd WD - additional issues?
- Re: external frames
- external frames
Friday, 26 September 2008
- Re: Gary's weird test case
- Re: Gary's weird test case
- Re: Gary's weird test case
- Gary's weird test case
- [Fwd: Re: status of rdf:text] - for discussion on DTB tomorrow
- Re: [Core] PROPOSED Core resolutions from telecon Monday, September 22
- Re: Remote Access to F2F11?
- Re: [Core] Definition of strict safeness
- Remote Access to F2F11?
- Couple more test cases
- Re: [Core] Definition of strict safeness
Thursday, 25 September 2008
- RE: Responses to YJH1 and NB1
- RE: [BLD] PS specs amendments
- [Core] Definition of strict safeness
- Re: [BLD] PS specs amendments
- Re: [BLD] PS specs amendments - -chairs: requires an action
- RE: [BLD] PS specs amendments
- Re: [BLD] PS specs amendments
- Responses to YJH1 and NB1
- RE: [BLD] PS specs amendments
Wednesday, 24 September 2008
- Re: [BLD] PS specs amendments
- RE: BLD -> XML
- RE: BLD -> XML
- RE: [BLD] PS specs amendments
- [BLD] PS specs amendments
- Re: BLD -> XML
- Re: absolute/relative URIs in PS (was Re: Lexing RIF PS)
- RE: absolute/relative URIs in PS (was Re: Lexing RIF PS)
- Re: absolute/relative URIs in PS (was Re: Lexing RIF PS)
- RE: [Core] PROPOSED Core resolutions from telecon Monday, September 22
- RE: absolute/relative URIs in PS (was Re: Lexing RIF PS)
- RE: absolute/relative URIs in PS (was Re: Lexing RIF PS)
- BLD -> XML
- new FLD
Tuesday, 23 September 2008
- RE: [Core] PROPOSED Core resolutions from telecon Monday, September 22
- absolute/relative URIs in PS (was Re: Lexing RIF PS)
- Re: Lexing RIF PS
- Re: Lexing RIF PS
- RE: Lexing RIF PS
- Re: Lexing RIF PS
- [Core] PROPOSED Core resolutions from telecon Monday, September 22
- Re: PS grammar question
- Response to PPS4
- Re: snapshots
- RE: snapshots
- PS syntax - again...
Monday, 22 September 2008
- Re: OWL 2 RL in RIF (Core)
- snapshots
- [PRD] [Core] variable binding restriction in PRD
- [DTB] Question arising from OWL 2 RL ruleset
- Re: OWL 2 RL in RIF (Core)
- [Core] Core telecon Monday, September 22 -- Notes
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 23 Sept
- OWL 2 RL in RIF (Core)
- Lexing RIF PS
- Re: PS grammar question
Sunday, 21 September 2008
- RE: PS grammar question
- Re: PS grammar question
- RE: PS grammar question
- Re: PS grammar question
- RE: PS grammar question
- RE: PS grammar question
- Re: PS grammar question
- PS grammar question
Saturday, 20 September 2008
- Re: [Admin] Agenda for F2F11
- Re: changes to test case templates
- Re: changes to test case templates
- RE: RIF-Core: proposing resolutions to current issues / RE: [Core] Core telecon Monday, September 22
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [BLD] problem with definition of entailment]
- changes to test case templates
Friday, 19 September 2008
- Re: [Admin] Agenda for F2F11
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [BLD] problem with definition of entailment]
- Response to AR1
- Re: the Language problem with Test Cases
- Sending responses to public comments RG1, JM1
Thursday, 18 September 2008
- the Language problem with Test Cases
- Editors - call for frozen drafts
- Re: [Admin] Agenda for F2F11
- Re: AW: [Admin] Agenda for F2F11
Wednesday, 17 September 2008
Tuesday, 16 September 2008
Monday, 15 September 2008
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon September 16
- Re: [Admin] Agenda for F2F11
- [Fwd: Re: [BLD] problem with definition of entailment]
- [Fwd: [BLD] problem with definition of entailment]
Sunday, 14 September 2008
Saturday, 13 September 2008
Friday, 12 September 2008
- 2nd CFP: Semantic Web Applications and Tools for Life Sciences Workshop (SWAT4LS)
- CfP: AAAI Spring Symposium on Intelligent Event Processing 2009
Thursday, 11 September 2008
- RE: CEP RIF <-- New member in the group
- CEP RIF <-- New member in the group
- [Admin] Agenda for F2F11
Tuesday, 9 September 2008
- RE: BLD vs PRD (was: Re: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign)
- New member in the group
- RE: BLD vs PRD (was: Re: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign)
- Draft meeting minutes: 9 Sep 2008
- Re: BLD vs PRD (was: Re: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign)
- Re: the new construct
- Re: the new construct
- Re: the new construct
- Re: more about object creation (ACTION-554)
- BLD vs PRD (was: Re: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign)
- Re: more about object creation (ACTION-554)
- Re: lmost all RE: production rule object creation actions and frame axioms
Monday, 8 September 2008
Friday, 5 September 2008
Thursday, 4 September 2008
- Re: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- [RIF-APS] AW: APS
- Re: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- RE: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- RE: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- Re: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- Re: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- Re: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- Re: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- Re: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- RE: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- RE: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- RE: more about object creation (ACTION-554)
- RE: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- RE: AW: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- RE: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
Wednesday, 3 September 2008
- RE: Congratulations on Christian's and co. courage
- Re: Congratulations on Christian's and co. courage
- Re: Congratulations on Christian's and co. courage
- RE: Congratulations on Christian's and co. courage
- RE: Congratulations on Christian's and co. courage
- RE: Congratulations on Christian's and co. courage
- RE: Congratulations on Christian's and co. courage
- RE: Congratulations on Christian's and co. courage
- Are you coming to RIF F2F 11 in New York in September?
- Re: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- AW: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- Re: Congratulations on Christian's and co. courage
- Re: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- RE: AW: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- RE: Congratulations on Christian's and co. courage
- F2F11 dinner
- RE: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- RE: Congratulations on Christian's and co. courage
- RE: AW: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- RE: Congratulations on Christian's and co. courage
- PRD: Congratulations on Christian's and co. courage
- Re: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
Tuesday, 2 September 2008
- more about object creation (ACTION-554)
- [Admin] Draft minutes of 2-Sept-2008 Telecon attached
- Re: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- Re: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- Re: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- Re: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- Re: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- Re: ISSUE-76: Equality in Core? [Core]
- ISSUE-76: Equality in Core? [Core]
- Re: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- RE: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- the new construct
- RE: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- Re: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- Re: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- Re: AW: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- Re: AW: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- Re: AW: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- Re: AW: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- Re: AW: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- Re: AW: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- Re: [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon September 2
- Re: AW: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- Re: AW: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- AW: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- Re: [RIF-Abridge PS] ACTION-569
- Re: [RIF-Abridge PS] ACTION-569
- Re: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- Re: RDF and OWL test cases
Monday, 1 September 2008
- Re: RDF and OWL test cases
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon September 2
- Re: [RIF-APS] Issue about implicit quantification
- [RIF-APS] Issue about implicit quantification
- [RIF-APS] Rules Sign
- Re: RIF discussion at SWIG at TPAC
- Re: [RIF] test cases from Axel
- RE: [RIF-Abridge PS] ACTION-569
- RE: [RIF-Abridge PS] ACTION-569
- RE: [RIF-Abridge PS] ACTION-569
- RE: [RIF-Abridge PS] ACTION-569
- [RIF-Abridge PS] ACTION-569
- Re: RIF discussion at SWIG at TPAC
- Re: RDF and OWL test cases
- Re: [RIF] test cases from Axel
- suggestion to add func:normalize-unicode to DTB ([Fwd: Re: UCS vs Unicode])