- From: Stella Mitchell <cleo@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:34:37 -0400
- To: <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2008 23:35:21 UTC
In the existing set of tests, a few of the conclusions need** to be condition formulas (eg [1]), none of them need to be document formulas, and by far most of them can be either. Do we want to have a style convention that says they should be conditions if they can, and documents only if they need to be (or the reverse)? Or just leave it to the preference of the submitter? Stella [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Disjunctive_Information_from_Negative_Guards_1 **although, couldn't those that entail non-atomic conditions also be be represented as: premises: .... ... test:passed() :- Or (... ) conclusion: Document ( Group ( test:passed() ) ) (it's not as readable for a human, I think)
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2008 23:35:21 UTC