- From: Gary Hallmark <gary.hallmark@oracle.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:55:27 -0700
- To: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
- CC: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
step 3 in the defn of RIF-PRD (retract object) should remove o#c1, o#c2, etc. This also resolves your editor's note. I think you should start numbering your frames with f1, not f0. Christian de Sainte Marie wrote: > > Guys, > > after re-reading my interpretation of Gary's proposal in terms of > entailment (oh, ok: after reading it :-) I found out that my version > of conditions 2 and 3 was much to strong: I think it should be "phi > |=/= f", not "f |=/= phi" (same in condition 3, mutatis mutandi). > > I made the correction on the wiki. > > Cheers, > > Christian > >
Received on Friday, 17 October 2008 21:57:28 UTC