- From: Hassan Ait-Kaci <hak@ilog.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:01:39 -0700
- To: "Hassan Ait-Kaci" <hak@ilog.com>, "Christian de Sainte Marie" <csma@ilog.fr>, "RIF WG" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <9FC9C6B2EA71ED4B826F55AC7C8B9AAB0C3E6F3E@mvmbx01.ilog.biz>
Sorry - forgot to attach the Fegaras-Maier paper. Here it is... -hak -- Hassan Aït-Kaci * ILOG, Inc. - Product Division R&D http://koala.ilog.fr/wiki/bin/view/Main/HassanAitKaci -----Original Message----- From: Hassan Ait-Kaci Sent: Tue 10/14/2008 3:59 PM To: Christian de Sainte Marie; RIF WG Subject: RE: [PRD] PRD TF telecon Tuesday 14 October Hello, I will not be able to attend today's PRD task force's telecon - so I am sending my regrets (since there is no page for PRD TF Telecon Regrets). Here is my take on the frame and aggregates issues as they are related): (1) Frames as they are defined and given semantics is BLD are useless for most OO models such as those used in Production Systems where objects have variable (field) arity and each field is mono-valued (BLD's frames have multi-valued fields). The designers of BLD (MK & HB) have defined a collection semantics based on aggregating mulitple values of a frame's fields using a set constructor. This is problematic as this introduces a confusion when a field's value is already a set. A safe, simple, and more general way that would solve this problem is not to build the set-collection semantics into BLD's semantics of frames with multiple field values, but rather to parametrize BLD's semantics with a monoid collector (that can be set, bag, list, +, *, max, ...) that is used to bundle and unbundle frame field values. In this way, all we have to do when exchanging BLD -> PRD or PRD -> BLD, the (normative) RIF XML format, is to specifiy a monoid collector per field (which could default to set if left unspecified). Then, all that needs to be done is to bundle/unbundle objects represented as frames, is declare what monoid (if any) is associated to a frame's field. This is simple to specify in the RIF XML format that we are defining to be normative. (1) A simple and formal semantics of aggregates suitable for PRD (and IMHO for BLD as well) and which is all we need to accommodate all sorts of aggregations as well as to deal with multiple-valued field frames, is described in the attached article whose reference is (which I have mentioned already several times to this WG): @article{Fegaras-Maier-TODS-00 author = {Leonidas Fegaras and David Maier}, title = {Optimizing object queries using an effective calculus}, journal = {ACM Trans. Database Syst.}, volume = {25}, number = {4}, year = {2000}, pages = {457--516}, publisher = {ACM}, address = {New York, NY, USA}, } I urge all would-be formal semanticists to *READ* this paper before trying to reinvent the (square) wheel. It is a very important paper in that it gives a simple, elegant, and effective formal operational semantics of all possible sorts of aggregates. -hak -- Hassan Aït-Kaci * ILOG, Inc. - Product Division R&D http://koala.ilog.fr/wiki/bin/view/Main/HassanAitKaci -----Original Message----- From: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org on behalf of Christian de Sainte Marie Sent: Mon 10/13/2008 6:42 PM To: RIF WG Subject: [PRD] PRD TF telecon Tuesday 14 October Teleconference W3C RIF WG Production rules dialect (PRD) task force 14 October 2008 North America and Europe are in the summer time: 1700 UTC, 1000 (West US) 1300 (East US) 1800 (London) 1900 (Paris) Duration: *60 min* *Proposed agenda* 1. Follow-up on the discussion about Frames VS Objects at the RIF telecon (15 mn) 2. Actions in PRD (30 mn) - Continued from last week [1]; see also Changhai's email and following thread [2] 3. Principles, scope and priorities (PRD wrt BLD, XML vs PS, prioritizing issues, timeline) (15 mn) 4. AOB - Next meeting [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/10/07-rif-prd-minutes.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Oct/0026.html *Telecon details* Zakim bridges: +1.617.761.6200 (US), +33 4 89 06 34 99 (F) or +44.117.370.6152 (GB) Conference code: 743773 ("RIFPRD") IRC Chat: irc:irc.w3.org (port 6665), #rif-prd Web-based IRC (member-only): [http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc] Please note that RIF-PRD telecons are for attendance only by RIF Working Group Participants and guests invited by the chairs. conference
Attachments
- application/pdf attachment: p457-fegaras.pdf
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2008 14:03:32 UTC