- From: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:20:08 +0200
- To: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <48EC6D38.1050704@inf.unibz.it>
Dave Reynolds wrote: > > As Jos pointed out at the telecon I had "rdfs:Literal" under the > "supported by RIF" column which is not strictly correct. It looks like I > had been misreading it as rdf:XMLLiteral. > > However, as far as I can tell the only support for rdfs:Literal needed > for OWL2/RL can be included in the ruleset[*] without needing any > specific RIF support and no changes to DTB. I've fixed up the rules in > the document accordingly and added a footnote to the table to clarify. > > Dave > > [*] > Essentially we just need additional rules of the form: > > Forall ?lt ( ?lt[rdf:type->rdfs:Literal] :- External( pred:isX(?lt)) ) > > For all supported datatypes X. I think that if Core will have any kind of safeness restriction, such rules will not be valid Core syntax. In the axiomatization of the OWL DL datatype semantics [1] I wrote the following: (Forall ?x (?x[rdf:type -> rdfs:Literal] :- ?x[rdf:type -> D])) for every datatype name D in V, (tr(s^^u)[rdf:type -> u']) for every well-typed literal s^^u and datatype identifier u' in V such that L2V(D(u))(s) is in the value space of u', (tr(t)[rdf:type -> u']) for every plain literal t and datatype identifier u' in V such that t is in the value space of u', (Forall ?x ([rdf:type -> rdfs:Literal] :- ?x[rdf:type -> Diri])) for every datatype in D with identifier Diri, (Forall ?x ("a"="b" :- And(?x[rdf:type -> Diri] isNotDT(?x)]))) for every datatype in D with identifier Diri and short name DT, (Forall ?x ("a"="b" :- And(?x[rdf:type -> owl:Thing] Or(isDT1(?x) ... isDTn(?x))]))), where DT1,..., DTn are the labels of the considered datatypes, (Forall ("a"="b" :- tr(t)[rdf:type -> rdfs:Literal])) for every ill-typed literal t, (Forall ?x ("a"="b" :- And(?x[rdf:type -> rdfs:Literal] isNotDT1(?x) ... isNotDTn(?x))])), where DT1,..., DTn are the labels of the considered datatypes You might not need all these rules (I don't really know about the OWL 2 RL semantics). Best, Jos [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-rdf-owl/#Embedding -- Jos de Bruijn debruijn@inf.unibz.it +390471016224 http://www.debruijn.net/ ---------------------------------------------- No one who cannot rejoice in the discovery of his own mistakes deserves to be called a scholar. - Donald Foster
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2008 08:20:43 UTC